Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCStruck OutKitale Land Case (ELC) – plaint dated 10/3/2015· [2019] KEELC 4781 (KLR)

Henry Shikuku Barasa & 2 others v Reuben Fwamba Mbita [2019] KEELC 4781 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
31 January 2019
1,850 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court struck out a church's land ownership suit because the church was never registered, so it had no legal capacity to sue or own land.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The plaintiffs, suing as authorized representatives of Matisi Outreach Church, claimed title to land parcel Kiminini/Kinyoro Block 3 (Matisi) 19 registered in the church's name since 1993, seeking a declaration of ownership and a permanent injunction against the defendant, who alleged the church fraudulently procured the title over land he and six others purchased in 1975/1976, and sought cancellation of the title. The court framed three issues: locus standi, fraudulent registration, and appropriate orders. On the threshold issue, it found that although the land was registered in the name of Matisi Outreach Church, that church was not a registered society, and the plaintiffs produced only the registration certificate of the umbrella body, Kenya Good News Outreach Churches, conceding the local church's unregistered status and that they were not its trustees. Relying on section 4 of the Societies Act and the Eritrea Orthodox Church, Free Pentecostal Fellowship and Anne Naliaka authorities, the court held an unregistered society cannot own land or sue through representatives, rendering the suit incompetent. The court did not adjudicate the fraud allegations on the merits. The suit was struck out with costs to the defendant on 31 January 2019.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the plaintiffs have locus standi to sue on behalf of Matisi Outreach Church

Holding

They do not; the church is unregistered and the plaintiffs proved neither registration nor trusteeship, so the suit is incompetent and is struck out

Reasoning

The plaintiffs produced only a certificate of registration of Kenya Good News Outreach Churches and conceded Matisi Outreach Church is not registered. Although leave under Order 1 Rule 8 was sought, an unregistered society cannot own land or be represented. Reliance was placed on Eritrea Orthodox Church v Wariwax and Free Pentecostal Fellowship in Kenya v Kenya Commercial Bank, where suits by unregistered religious bodies were rendered null or dismissed. The plaintiffs failed to prove the church's registration or connection to the umbrella body.

p. 3
02

Whether the suit land was fraudulently registered in the plaintiffs' name

Holding

The court found the registration irregular but, having struck out the suit on locus standi, made no definitive finding on fraud or ownership

Reasoning

The court observed that the land is registered in the name of Matisi Outreach Church but that this registration is irregular because the church is unregistered and thus incapable of holding title. The defendant's detailed allegations of fraud in obtaining the title were not adjudicated on the merits since the suit failed at the threshold stage on capacity.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • An unregistered society is an unlawful society and cannot own land or sue in its own name
  • A suit instituted on behalf of an unregistered religious organization, even with leave under Order 1 Rule 8, is incompetent

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The plaintiffs' suit is struck out with costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Societies ActSection 4
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 1 rule 8

Cases cited (5)

  • Eritrea Orthodox Church -Vs- Wariwax Generation Ltd
    [2007] eKLR
  • Anne Naliaka, Edward F. Khaoya, Col. Tom Wanambisi Dawson Mudenyo (Being Officials of Kitale Family House of Hope) v Benson Nyongesa Wamalwa as Trustee Covenant of Holiness Ministries (Kitale Land Case No. 138 of 2013)
    null
  • Free Pentecostal Fellowship in Kenya -vs- Kenya Commercial Bank Ltd (Nairobi High Court Civil Case No. 5116 of 1992 (OS))
    null
  • Josephat Kimani Mirara & Others suing as Officials of Githurai Victory Market S.H.O. -vs- Romano K. Mikigu (Nairobi ELC No. 969 of 2012)
    null
  • Henry Shikuku Barasa & Others -vs- Reuben Fwamba Mbita (Kitale Misc. Civil Appl. No. 4 of 2015)
    null
Jurisdiction invoked
Original jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court over land disputes (per plaint filed in the court at Kitale); no specific constitutional provision invoked

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Henry Shikuku Barasa & 2 others v Reuben Fwamba Mbita [2019] KEELC 4781 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). Kitale Land Case (ELC) – plaint dated 10/3/2015. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2019/4781/eng@2019-01-31

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.