Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNotice of Motion dated 4th October 2018 arising from an appeal against CMCC No. 618 of 2018· [2019] KEELC 4606 (KLR)

Agnes Wahura Kamau v Purity Mbete & another [2019] KEELC 4606 (KLR)

High Court of Kenya
31 January 2019
947 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling by the High Court (E. O. Obaga, J) determined a Notice of Motion dated 4th October 2018 seeking an interim stay of execution of a ruling of the Senior Resident Magistrate's Court at Milimani dated 20th September 2018, pending hearing of the applicant's appeal. The underlying dispute concerns properties Nairobi Block 107/1442 and 1443 belonging to James Maina Gathigo, who disappeared in 2009 and has never resurfaced. The applicant and the first respondent each claim to have been married to him, and both claim entitlement to the rental income from the properties. The trial magistrate had stayed an injunction previously granted in the applicant's favour and ordered that rental income from the disputed properties be deposited in court pending determination of the suit. The applicant, asserting that she constructed the buildings and had collected rent since 2009 as her only source of income, contended the deposit order would cause her substantial loss. The first respondent opposed, maintaining the suit properties belonged to her husband, that she had litigated over them since 2009 in HCCC No. 309 of 2009, that the deposit order placed the rival claimants on an equal footing, and that she was not benefiting from the rentals. The court identified the sole issue as whether the applicant met the stay threshold: absence of undue delay, substantial loss, and security for due performance. Delay was not unreasonable, but no substantial loss was demonstrated, and no presumption of death of the properties' owner had been established. The application was dismissed with costs to the first respondent.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the applicant met the threshold for grant of stay of execution pending appeal

Holding

The application was brought timeously but the applicant failed to demonstrate substantial loss; the application was dismissed with costs.

Reasoning

The court set out the three conditions for stay: no undue delay, substantial loss, and security for due performance. Delay of about two weeks in filing the application was not unreasonable. However, the applicant's claim that rental income was her only source of income and that she constructed the buildings was not substantiated as evidence of substantial loss, especially where ownership and marital status were unresolved and no presumption of death of the property owner had been established.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An applicant for stay of execution must show that the application was brought without undue delay, that substantial loss will be suffered if stay is refused, and that there is security for due performance of the decree or order
  • Demonstration of substantial loss is the cornerstone for grant of stay of execution pending appeal

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application for stay of execution of the trial court's orders of 20th September 2018 is dismissed
  2. 2.Costs of the application to the first respondent
On appeal from
Senior Resident Magistrate's Court at Milimani (Chief Magistrate's Court, Milimani Commercial Courts)
CMCC No. 618 of 2018
Jurisdiction invoked
Inherent appellate jurisdiction to grant stay of execution pending appeal (orders of the trial magistrate dated 20th September 2018); no specific provision quoted

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Agnes Wahura Kamau v Purity Mbete & another [2019] KEELC 4606 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). Notice of Motion dated 4th October 2018 arising from an appeal against CMCC No. 618 of 2018. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2019/4606/eng@2019-01-31

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.