Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedMiscellaneous Application No. 2 of 2018· [2019] KEELC 4498 (KLR)

Kenya Airports Authority v National Land Commission; East African Gas Company Limited & 2 others (Interested Parties) [2019] KEELC 4498 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
22 February 2019
3,242 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~13 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's High Court-level Environment and Land Court dismissed Kenya Airports Authority's attempt to overturn a land decision, ruling ownership disputes must go through ordinary civil suits, not judicial review.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Kenya Airports Authority, by substantive notice of motion filed after leave granted on 16 January 2018, sought orders of certiorari to quash the National Land Commission's decision gazetted on 17 July 2017 upholding Title No. MN/VI/4114 (formerly MN/VI/3853-62) in favour of East African Gas Company Limited, and prohibition restraining the Commission from interfering with its occupation of the plot housing Moi International Airport. The applicant argued the Commission lacked power to determine land disputes, failed to serve it personally, and made its decision while related suits were pending. The DPP and EACC supported the application; the Commission and the 1st Interested Party opposed, showing notice was published in daily newspapers on 27 July 2015 and that hearings were public. Justice A. Omollo held that none of the titles was registered in the applicant's name and that its documents failed to establish the nexus to the suit parcels, so publication of the notice sufficed under section 14(3) of the National Land Commission Act. The Commission's offer to revise its decision on new evidence satisfied article 47. The Court found no proof the Commission purported to adjudicate the ownership dispute, rejected the lis pendens argument as the Commission lacked knowledge of the pending suits, and applied Republic v NTSA ex parte James Maina Mugo, holding contested ownership facts belong in ordinary civil suits. The judicial review application was dismissed with costs to the Respondent and the 1st Interested Party.

Key legal issues

#
01

Sufficiency of notice by publication under section 14 of the National Land Commission Act

Holding

Publication in daily newspapers was sufficient; the Respondent was under no obligation to serve personal notice on the Applicant

Reasoning

None of the individual titles was in the Applicant's name and the documents annexed did not connect the Applicant to the disputed parcel numbers. The complaint originated from the County Government of Mombasa. Publication invited anyone with an interest to come forward; the Applicant did not. The Respondent further offered to revise its decision on receipt of new evidence, which the Court held was equivalent to affording a hearing under article 47.

02

Whether the Respondent usurped jurisdiction over a land ownership dispute

Holding

The Applicant failed to show the Respondent exercised jurisdiction to determine the ownership dispute; the determination made no reference to the Applicant

Reasoning

The Respondent's decision listed only the legality and propriety of the grants and whether the claimant was an innocent purchaser, with no mention of any dispute between the Applicant and the 1st Interested Party. The Applicant's ownership claim and the illegalities of its former managing director could not be ventilated in judicial review.

p. 4
03

Lis pendens

Holding

The doctrine could not be invoked because the Respondent had no notice of the pending suits before the decision

Reasoning

The Respondent was not a party to the criminal case and was only joined in ELC Case No. 298 of 2014 in April 2018, after the impugned decision was gazetted. The doctrine applies only where the tribunal, having been moved, acts contrary to the law.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • Judicial review is concerned with the decision-making process, not the merits or private rights, and disputes of fact are for ordinary civil suits
  • Where persons potentially interested are unknown, publication of notice in daily newspapers constitutes sufficient notice under section 14(3) of the National Land Commission Act

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The substantive notice of motion dated 22 January 2018 seeking orders of certiorari and prohibition is dismissed
  2. 2.Costs awarded to the Respondent and the 1st Interested Party
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 47 of the Constitution; sections 7, 8, 9 and 11 of the Fair Administrative Action Act 2015; section 1A & B of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 53 of the Civil Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenya Airports Authority v National Land Commission; East African Gas Company Limited & 2 others (Interested Parties) [2019] KEELC 4498 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). Miscellaneous Application No. 2 of 2018. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2019/4498/eng@2019-02-22

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.