Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNot stated (Notice of Motion dated 22nd November, 2016)· [2019] KEELC 4423 (KLR)

Peninah Ndege v Joseph Nyangau Bogonko & another [2019] KEELC 4423 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
25 February 2019
1,067 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Kajiado Environment and Land Court dismissed a landowner's bid to revisit a 2015 judgment, confirming that unexplained delay and already-filed appeals bar review.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was a ruling on the Defendants' Notice of Motion dated 22nd November 2016, brought under sections 1A, 1B, 3 and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act and Orders 40 and 51 of the Civil Procedure Rules, seeking review of the judgment of Justice Kariuki delivered on 20th February 2015 and the orders of Justice Gitumbi of 28th October 2016 dismissing an application for stay. The applicant contended that Justice Kariuki was not gazetted as an Environment and Land Court Judge and that Justice Gitumbi erred in failing to consider affidavit averments. The respondent opposed, arguing the applications were similar, the proper remedy was appeal rather than review, the application invoked wrong provisions, and no new matter had been discovered. The court framed two issues: whether the 2015 judgment and proceedings should be reviewed, and whether the orders of 28th October 2016 should be reviewed. Applying section 80 of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 45 rule 1, the court found no new and important matter or error apparent on the face of the record, noted inordinate unexplained delay since February 2015, and held that Karisa Chengo could not apply retrospectively since it postdated the judgment and the trial Judge had been permitted by High Court Practice Directions to hear land matters. The application was dismissed with costs on 25th February 2019.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the judgment of 20th February 2015 should be reviewed on the ground that the presiding Judge was not gazetted as an Environment and Land Court Judge

Holding

Ground fails; the trial Judge was permitted under High Court Practice Directions to hear land matters, and Karisa Chengo does not apply retrospectively

Reasoning

The applicant relied on Karisa Chengo to argue the Judge lacked jurisdiction. The court noted that decision was delivered in October 2016, over a year after the judgment sought to be reviewed. Practice Directions then allowed the Judge to hear land matters, and the decision cannot operate retrospectively, especially as parties had already applied to execute the decree.

p. 2
02

Whether there was delay and absence of grounds for review

Holding

Application unmerited due to inordinate unexplained delay and lack of new material

Reasoning

The judgment was delivered in February 2015 but review was only sought years later with no explanation. No new and important matter, evidence, or error apparent on the face of the record was demonstrated to meet the thresholds in Section 80 of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 45 rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Review requires discovery of new and important matter, error apparent on the face of the record, or other sufficient reason, applied for without unreasonable delay
  • Where a party has lodged an appeal, the remedy lies in appeal rather than review

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice of Motion application dated 22nd November, 2016 is dismissed with costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure Actsections 1A, 1B, 3, 3A, 80
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 40 rules 1 & 2; Order 45 rule 1(1); Order 51 rule 1

Cases cited (1)

  • Karisa Chengo, Jefferson Kalama Kengha & Kitsao Charo Ngati Vs Republic
    (2015) eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Sections 1A, 1B, 3 and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act; Order 40 rules 1 & 2 and Order 51 rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Peninah Ndege v Joseph Nyangau Bogonko & another [2019] KEELC 4423 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). Not stated (Notice of Motion dated 22nd November, 2016). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2019/4423/eng@2019-02-25

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.