Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedELC. CIVIL SUIT NO 339 OF 2010· [2019] KEELC 4297 (KLR)

Ramokia Housing Co-operative Society Limited v George Kuria Mwaura & 2 others [2019] KEELC 4297 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
28 February 2019
4,122 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~16 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The plaintiff cooperative society sued for an injunction restraining the defendants from dealing with L.R. Nos. 9363/191 and 9363/197 (about 18 acres carved out of L.R. No. 9363/85), cancellation of the transfer of those parcels to the 3rd defendant, specific performance, a refund of Kshs. 4,770,000/= assessed at current market value, damages for breach and costs. Its case was that it bought 30 acres from the late Kahuhu Kuogothoka through attorneys (the 1st and 2nd defendants), paid for 18 acres, took possession, and had the parcels surveyed for transfer, only for the defendants to transfer them to the 3rd defendant after the donor's death. The 1st and 2nd defendants denied selling only 30 acres, asserted the plaintiff breached the agreements by non-payment, claimed the power of attorney lapsed on the donor's death on 17/8/2009, and counterclaimed. The 3rd defendant claimed it was a bona fide purchaser without notice. The court found the only executed sale agreement was for 30 acres and no agreement mentioned the suit parcels; the plaintiff did not pay the full price and thus was not ready, able and willing to perform, defeating specific performance. The power of attorney lapsed on the donor's death, and the transfers to the 3rd defendant were registered on 21/6/2010, after his death, raising questions under the Law of Succession Act. The refund claim should have been directed to the deceased's legal representatives, whom the plaintiff failed to join. The plaintiff failed to prove its case on a balance of probabilities; the suit was dismissed with each party bearing its own costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Plaintiff proved entitlement to specific performance, injunction and cancellation of title

Holding

The Plaintiff failed to prove its case on a balance of probabilities; the suit was dismissed

Reasoning

The only executed agreement produced was for 30 acres, not the 18 acres claimed, and no agreement mentioned L.R. Nos. 9363/191 and 197. The Plaintiff paid only Kshs. 4,770,000/= out of the price and led no evidence connecting the land it bought to the parcels transferred to the 3rd Defendant. Without proof of willingness and ability to complete, specific performance and the consequential orders could not issue.

p. 4
02

Effect of the death of the donor of the power of attorney

Holding

The power of attorney lapsed upon the donor's death on 17/8/2009, and dealings with the land thereafter required letters of administration

Reasoning

Kahuhu Kuogothoka died on 17/8/2009, but the transfers of L.R. Nos. 9363/191 and 197 to the 3rd Defendant were registered on 21/6/2010. The court found the power of attorney had lapsed and questioned how the 1st Defendant could transfer the deceased's land without first obtaining letters of administration as required by the Law of Succession Act.

p. 4
03

Whether the Plaintiff's refund claim could be sustained against the 1st and 2nd Defendants

Holding

The refund claim ought to be directed to the legal administrators of the estate of the late Kahuhu Kuogothoka

Reasoning

The 1st and 2nd Defendants maintained they remitted the Kshs. 4,770,000/= received from the Plaintiff to the late Kahuhu Kuogothoka. The court accepted that as attorneys acting for the deceased vendor, the proper party to any refund claim was the legal representative of his estate, whom the Plaintiff failed to join despite the court's indication on 14/12/2017.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • A power of attorney lapses upon the death of the donor
  • A party seeking specific performance must prove readiness, ability and willingness to perform its obligations under the contract
  • Transfers of a deceased person's land require letters of administration under the Law of Succession Act

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Plaintiff's suit is dismissed
  2. 2.Each party will bear its own costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Law of Succession Act
  • Law Society Conditions of Sale (1989 Edition)

Cases cited (1)

  • William Muthee Muthami v Bank of Baroda
    [2014] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Original civil jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court over land disputes

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Ramokia Housing Co-operative Society Limited v George Kuria Mwaura & 2 others [2019] KEELC 4297 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). ELC. CIVIL SUIT NO 339 OF 2010. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2019/4297/eng@2019-02-28

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.