Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedMombasa ELC suit re L.R No. Kwale/Mkongani 'B'/295 (Plaint filed 28 March 2017)· [2019] KEELC 4294 (KLR)

Omar Mohamed Kikarata v Sudi Hamisi [2019] KEELC 4294 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
7 March 2019
626 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Plaintiff sued for eviction, police supervision of the eviction, a permanent injunction, costs and interest, pleading that he is the registered owner of L.R No. Kwale/Mkongani 'B'/295, having purchased it on 20 September 2014 from Matano Juma Mbaruku, the previously registered owner. The Defendant entered appearance on 3 May 2017 but never filed a defence, so interlocutory judgment was entered and the matter proceeded to formal proof as an undefended suit. At the hearing the Plaintiff testified, adopted his witness statement and produced a certificate of title issued on 19 November 2014, an official search dated 13 November 2013 and his documentary list as exhibits. In submissions filed on 12 November 2018 he showed that on 17 May 2016 he discovered the Defendant had faked a green card inserting himself as proprietor; the Land Registrar Kwale, after verification, cancelled the fraudulent entry and restored the Plaintiff as absolute owner. It was further submitted that the Defendant's claim over the land had already been dismissed with costs in Mombasa ELC No. 66 of 2014 by ruling dated 18 September 2014, and his Petition No. 265 of 2014 struck out with costs on 13 July 2016. The court found the Plaintiff had proved his case on a balance of probabilities, allowed prayers (a), (b) and (c), directed the Defendant to surrender vacant possession within 60 days of service of the decree, with supervised eviction in default, and ordered each party to bear their own costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Proof of ownership of registered land at formal proof

Holding

The Plaintiff proved his ownership of the suit property on a balance of probabilities through his certificate of title, official search and documentary exhibits, entitling him to eviction and a permanent injunction

Reasoning

The plaintiff testified as the registered proprietor, produced his certificate of title issued on 19 November 2014 and an official search dated 13 November 2013, and adopted his witness statement and documentary list as exhibits. He showed he purchased the land from Matano Juma Mbaruku, the prior registered owner, and that the Defendant's green card was fraudulent and cancelled by the Land Registrar. The undefended claim therefore succeeded.

p. 2
02

Justification for the Defendant's continued occupation

Holding

There was no justification for the Defendant's continued occupation, given prior dismissals of his claim and petition over the same land

Reasoning

The court considered the documents filed and found nothing to justify the Defendant remaining on the land. Counsel's submissions showed the Defendant's prior claim over the suit land had been dismissed with costs in High Court Mombasa ELC No. 66 of 2014 and his Petition No. 265 of 2014 struck out with costs, leaving him without any lawful basis to occupy the property.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Where a defendant fails to file a defence and the matter proceeds to formal proof, a plaintiff who proves title to registered land on a balance of probabilities is entitled to eviction and injunction orders

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Prayers (a), (b) and (c) of the plaint allowed, i.e. eviction of the Defendant from Plot No. KWALE/MKONGENI 'B'/295, police supervision of the eviction, and a permanent injunction restraining the Defendant from trespassing on, developing or entering the suit property
  2. 2.Defendant directed to surrender vacant possession of the suit property within 60 days of service of the decree
  3. 3.In default of surrender of possession, plaintiff to carry out the eviction exercise and the OCS Kwale Police Station to supervise to ensure law and order is maintained
  4. 4.Each party to meet their respective costs of the suit
Jurisdiction invoked
Original jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court over land parcels and eviction claims

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Omar Mohamed Kikarata v Sudi Hamisi [2019] KEELC 4294 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). Mombasa ELC suit re L.R No. Kwale/Mkongani 'B'/295 (Plaint filed 28 March 2017). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2019/4294/eng@2019-03-07

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.