Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedELC Case (Murang'a) - suit filed 9/5/2012· [2019] KEELC 4083 (KLR)

Gladys Njeri Muhura v Lispa Wagaturi Muthiguro [2019] KEELC 4083 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
21 March 2019
1,885 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~8 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This Environment and Land Court judgment at Murang'a resolved a family land dispute between two widows of step-brothers, Muhura Kiganda and Muthiguro Kiganda, sons of Kiganda Muthiguro. The Plaintiff sued on 9 May 2012 seeking a declaration that the late Muthiguro Kiganda held half of parcel LOC 8/KARI KARURU/232 in trust for her late husband, and that the trust be dissolved to allow subdivision and transfer of a half share to her. The land was registered in Muthiguro's name on 24 September 1957, at which time Muhura was away (the Plaintiff said in detention; the Defendant said running a shop in Nairobi). The Defendant denied any trust, asserting his father owned the land absolutely and bought additional fragments, and suggested the Plaintiff should claim against parcel 170 registered in the name of Watati Kiganda. The court framed one issue: whether the Plaintiff proved a customary trust. Relying on section 28(b) of the Land Registration Act, Cap 300 provisions and the Supreme Court's decision in Isack M'Inanga Kieba, the judge found that the land was family land registered in the name of the eldest son, that the Defendant's evidence on purchased fragments was unsubstantiated and that his account of demarcation was unreliable given his age. Both families had lived peacefully on the land for over 60 years on separate portions. A customary trust was proved on a balance of probabilities. The court declared the half-share trust, dissolved it, ordered subdivision and registration of a half share in the Plaintiff, and directed each party to bear their own costs given their close family relationship. A claim regarding parcel 170 was declined as it and its occupants were not before the court.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether a customary trust existed over LOC 8/KARI KARURU/232 in favour of Muhura Kiganda's family

Holding

Yes - a customary trust to the extent of a half share was proved on a balance of probabilities

Reasoning

The land was family land registered in 1957 in the name of Muthiguro, the eldest son, while Muhura was away at demarcation. Both families have lived on the land for over 60 years, occupying distinct portions and burying their dead there without objection. The Defendant gave no particulars of any purchased fragments. Applying the Kieba elements, the trust was established. Balance of probabilities satisfied.

p. 3
02

Whether registration under the Land Registration Act defeats an unregistered customary trust

Holding

No - customary trusts are overriding interests under section 28(b) of the Land Registration Act and bind registered proprietors

Reasoning

Section 28(b) of the Land Registration Act, 2012 (mirroring sections 27, 28 and 30 of the repealed Registered Land Act, Cap 300) provides that registered land is subject to trusts including customary trusts without their being noted on the register. Kanyi v Muthiora confirms registration does not extinguish Kikuyu customary law rights or trustee duties.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Registration of land does not extinguish rights arising under customary law trust obligations
  • A customary trust need not be registered; it subsists as an overriding interest binding on the land
  • Customary trust claims are assessed case by case on the quality of evidence against the elements set out in the Kieba decision

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Declared that the late Muthiguro Kiganda held land parcel LOC8/KARI KARURU/232 in trust for the late Muhura Kiganda to the extent of a half share (0.95 acres)
  2. 2.Dissolved the trust and directed that the suit land be subdivided and a half share registered in the name of the Plaintiff as administrator of the estate of Muhura Kiganda
  3. 3.Directed that each party bears their own costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 60(1)(a)
  • Registered Land Act (repealed), Cap 300Sections 27, 28, 30
  • Land Registration Act, 2012Sections 24, 25, 26, 28 (including 28(b))

Cases cited (3)

  • Kanyi Vs Muthiora
    1984 KLR 712
  • Isack M'Inanga Kieba Vs Isaaya Theuri M'Lintari & Isack Ntongai M'Lintari
    SCOK Petition 10 of 2015
  • Kiarie v. Kinuthia
Jurisdiction invoked
Original civil jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court over land held in customary trust

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Gladys Njeri Muhura v Lispa Wagaturi Muthiguro [2019] KEELC 4083 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). ELC Case (Murang'a) - suit filed 9/5/2012. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2019/4083/eng@2019-03-21

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.