Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedJudicial Review Application (Notice of Motion dated 10th May 2018) - Miscellaneous Application (not numbered in judgment)· [2019] KEELC 4016 (KLR)

Jared Otieno Awello v Land Registrar Homa - Bay County & another [2019] KEELC 4016 (KLR)

High Court of Kenya
13 February 2019
1,496 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's High Court ordered the Chief Land Registrar to register an estate beneficiary as land co-owner after he refused without giving written reasons.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The ex parte applicant, Jared Otieno Owello, son of the late Awello Andhao, obtained a grant of letters of administration intestate and a confirmed certificate of grant in Ndhiwa Senior Resident Magistrate's Court Succession Cause No. 40 of 2016 over his father's estate. The estate forms part of land parcel Kanyamwa/Kajwang/Kachola/Kadwet/366, registered in the names of three brothers including the deceased. Despite several petitions, the Chief Land Registrar refused to register the beneficiaries as co-owners, prompting a judicial review application by notice of motion under Order 53 Rules 3 and 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules, sections 8 and 9 of the Law Reform Act and Article 47(1) of the Constitution, seeking mandamus to compel registration plus costs. The respondents were duly served but neither appeared nor filed responses. Adopting counsel's issues, Ongondo J framed two questions: whether the Registrar owed a statutory public duty to register the applicant as co-owner, and whether the applicant was entitled to the orders sought. The court found that under Section 7A of the Law of Succession Act the deceased's property vested in the applicant as personal representative, and that under Sections 3, 26(1) and 30 of the Land Registration Act the Registrar was under a duty to register him and issue a title upon transmission. Relying on District Commissioner Kiambu -v- Republic Ex-parte Ethan Njau, the court held mandamus was appropriate, particularly since the Registrar gave no written reasons for the refusal, contrary to Article 47's fair administrative action guarantee. Mandamus was granted in terms of prayer one. However, invoking Rai -v- Rai and the proviso to Section 27 of the Civil Procedure Act, the court directed each party to bear their own costs. Judgment delivered at Migori on 13th February 2019.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the 1st respondent (Land Registrar) owes a statutory public duty to register the applicant as co-owner

Holding

Yes. Under Sections 3, 26(1) and 30 of the Land Registration Act, upon transmission the Registrar has a duty to register the applicant and issue him a certificate of title.

Reasoning

The applicant, holder of a confirmed grant in Ndhiwa SRM Succession Cause No. 40 of 2016, is the legal representative of the deceased whose estate is part of the suit parcel registered in the names of the deceased brothers. The land therefore vests in him as personal representative under Section 7A of the Law of Succession Act, and registration is the Registrar's statutory duty. The Registrar gave no written reasons for refusing registration, contrary to Article 47.

02

Whether mandamus is an appropriate remedy in the circumstances

Holding

Yes. Mandamus is available to compel a registrar who refuses to perform a statutory duty, and is particularly apt where the fault lies with the registrar.

Reasoning

The court relied on District Commissioner Kiambu -v- Republic Ex-parte Ethan Njau, holding that mandamus to the registrar is one method of correcting an erroneous register entry and applies where the official refuses to act when he should act. The Registrar failed to give written reasons for non-registration, offending the right to fair administrative action under Article 47, so the remedy was readily available.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An order of mandamus compels the performance of a legal duty imposed on public officers by statute or common law.
  • Mandamus lies against a land registrar who refuses to act in circumstances in which he should act, including to correct an erroneous entry in the register.
  • The property of a deceased person vests in the personal representative upon grant of representation.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.An order of mandamus compelling the 1st respondent to register the applicant as co-owner of land parcel number Kanyamwa/Kajwang/Kachola/Kadwet/366, being the estate of the late Awello Andhao
  2. 2.Each party to bear their own respective costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010Order 53 Rules 1, 2, 3 and 4; Order 51 Rule 16
  • Law Reform Act (Cap 26 Laws of Kenya)Sections 8 and 9
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 47(1)
  • Land Registration ActSections 3, 26(1) and 30
  • Civil Procedure Act (Cap 21 Laws of Kenya)Section 2 (definition of legal representative) and Section 27 (costs)
  • Law of Succession Act (Cap 160 Laws of Kenya)Section 7A

Cases cited (9)

  • Republic -v- Chief Land Registrar and 4 others ex parte Charles P. Chemmuttut
    (2017) eKLR
  • The Seventh Day Adventist Church (East Africa) Ltd -vs- The National Land Commission and 3 Others
    (2017) eKLR
  • Republic -v- the Principal Secretary, State Department of Interior and Coordination of National Government and another ex-parte Salim Awadh Salim
    (2017) eKLR
  • Cecilia Karuru Ngayu -v- Barclays Bank of Kenya and another
    (2018) eKLR
  • Khobesh Agencies Ltd and 32 others -v- Minister of Relations and 4 others
    (2013) eKLR
  • Shah -v- Attorney General (No. 3)
    Kampala HCMN No. 31 of 1969 (1970) EA 543
  • Republic -v- Attorney General and another ex-parte Jackson Musyoka Munyalo
    (2015) eKLR
  • District Commissioner Kiambu -v- Republic and others Ex-parte Ethan Njau
    (1960) E.A 109
  • Rai -v- Rai
    (2014) eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Sections 8 and 9 of the Law Reform Act (Cap 26) and Order 53 Rules 3 and 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010, with Article 47(1) of the Constitution

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Jared Otieno Awello v Land Registrar Homa - Bay County & another [2019] KEELC 4016 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). Judicial Review Application (Notice of Motion dated 10th May 2018) - Miscellaneous Application (not numbered in judgment). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2019/4016/eng@2019-02-13

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.