Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedBungoma ELC Case (consolidated with Bungoma High Court Civil Case No. 58 of 2006 and Bungoma ELC Case No. 217 of 2013)· [2019] KEELC 3828 (KLR)

Dyphina M Khaonjeli v Waziri Abubakari Ali & 2 others [2019] KEELC 3828 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
27 March 2019
1,671 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court allowed a landowner to enforce her adverse possession win, rejecting arguments that her case was already decided or under appeal.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling by Boaz N. Olao J of the Environment and Land Court at Bungoma, dated 27th March 2019, determined a Notice of Motion dated 6th September 2018 by Dyphina M. Khaonjeli seeking to enforce a decree for adverse possession granted by the late Mukunya J on 22nd February 2018. The decree extinguished the Respondents' rights over a portion measuring 25 yards by 10 yards out of NDIVISI/MUCHI/5169, declared the Applicant its absolute owner, ordered cancellation of the sub-divided new numbers, restrained interference, and directed the Respondents to execute transfer documents. The Applicant complained that despite service, the Respondents refused to sign the transfer documents. The Respondents raised a preliminary objection contending the suit was res judicata per Bungoma High Court Civil Case No. 58 of 2006 and sub judice because the judgment had been appealed. The court held that the former suit's ex parte judgment had been set aside by consent on 8th March 2011, so it was never 'heard and finally decided' under Section 7 of the Civil Procedure Act; that a Notice of Appeal is not an appeal and no stay of proceedings existed under Section 6; and that counsel for the Respondents, having consented to consolidation on 17th May 2016, could not resile. The preliminary objection was dismissed and the Notice of Motion allowed as prayed.

Key legal issues

#
01

Res judicata

Holding

The plea fails because the cited former suit was set aside by consent before hearing and was never 'heard and finally decided'

Reasoning

The court perused the record of Bungoma High Court Civil Case No. 58 of 2006. It found the ex parte eviction judgment obtained there was set aside by consent on 8th March 2011, allowing the Applicant to enter appearance and file defence. Since Section 7 requires the matter to have been heard and finally decided, res judicata was not established. The objection also came too late, having been raised only after trial before Mukunya J.

p. 2
02

Sub judice / Section 6 Civil Procedure Act

Holding

The objection fails; no appeal was filed and there is no stay of proceedings

Reasoning

Counsel for the Respondents submitted the judgment of Mukunya J had been appealed. The court found only a Notice of Appeal dated 6th March 2018 on record; a Notice of Appeal is not an appeal. Even if an appeal existed, no stay of proceedings had been granted, so Section 6 did not bar the court from proceeding.

p. 2
03

Enforcement of decree for adverse possession

Holding

The Notice of Motion seeking survey, sub-division, transfer and cancellation of title is merited

Reasoning

The application seeks to enforce the decree arising from Mukunya J's judgment of 22nd February 2018, which was neither appealed nor reviewed. The Respondents, though served with the decree, refused to sign transfer documents and did not rebut that averment beyond the preliminary objection. The court held courts should not act in vain and allowed the motion as prayed.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • A preliminary objection based on res judicata should be raised at the earliest opportunity as it goes to the jurisdiction of the Court
  • Res judicata under Section 7 requires that the former suit was heard and finally decided
  • A Notice of Appeal is not an appeal; Section 6 of the Civil Procedure Act does not bar proceedings absent a filed appeal or stay
  • A party who consented to consolidation cannot later plead res judicata or sub judice
  • A party cannot be denied the fruits of an unappealed judgment by refusing to sign transfer documents

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Preliminary Objection on res judicata and sub judice is dismissed
  2. 2.The Notice of Motion dated 6th September 2018 is allowed as prayed

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure ActSection 7
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 6
Jurisdiction invoked
Original civil jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court following consolidation of suits by consent order dated 17th May 2016

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Dyphina M Khaonjeli v Waziri Abubakari Ali & 2 others [2019] KEELC 3828 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). Bungoma ELC Case (consolidated with Bungoma High Court Civil Case No. 58 of 2006 and Bungoma ELC Case No. 217 of 2013). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2019/3828/eng@2019-03-27

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.