Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially Allowed· [2019] KEELC 3540 (KLR)

Kaboyi Merkor v County Land Adjudication & Settlement Officer, West Pokot County & 3 others [2019] KEELC 3540 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court / High Court at Kitale
30 April 2019
1,499 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court allowed a land surveyor's site visit during a pending case, but made the applicant pay all the costs of the exercise.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling by Mwangi Njoroge, Judge, at Kitale on a Notice of Motion dated 12/2/2019 by the plaintiff in an ongoing land dispute over parcels West Pokot/Chepareria/558 and 490. The plaintiff sought an order directing the County Surveyor Trans-Nzoia County and the Deputy Registrar, in the presence of the local Chief and Elders, to visit the parcels and ascertain occupation, boundaries, acreage under each party's occupation, whether the plaintiff's family occupied parcel 490, and whether the mapping of parcel 490 accorded with adjudication records, with a report to be filed within 30 days. The 1st defendant opposed, arguing the claim was for 60 acres and not a boundary dispute, that titles issued under the Land Adjudication Act Cap 284 were unchallenged, and that the application was an attempt to circumvent the status quo orders of 15/11/2018. The 2nd to 5th defendants filed grounds of opposition, alleging the motion sought the court's help to prove the plaintiff's case and was a concealed appeal against the 15/11/18 orders. The court held it had power to order a surveyor's visit in deserving cases, that the verification of occupation was in the interest of all parties, and that the application was neither an appeal against nor a circumvention of the status quo order. It granted the application with terms: the County Surveyor (not the Deputy Registrar) to conduct the visit and file a report within 30 days, with the applicant bearing the costs of both the application and the survey exercise.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the court may order a site visit by a surveyor pending determination of the suit notwithstanding a subsisting status quo order

Holding

Yes; the status quo order does not bar a surveyor from verifying facts on the ground, and the application is not an appeal against or circumvention of the 15/11/2018 orders.

Reasoning

The court acknowledged that the surveyor's report would assist in determining the suit, but held it must also consider the interests of all parties and the terms on which to grant the orders. The 1st defendant alleged the application was meant to circumvent the status quo order of 15/11/2018, but the court held a surveyor's access to verify facts does not violate that order, and that the fact the orders favour the plaintiff's proof is not a ground to decline the application; instead, terms as to costs may be imposed.

p. 2
02

Whether the fact that the orders sought predominantly aid the plaintiff's case is a ground for refusal

Holding

No; the court may grant such an application on terms, here special orders as to costs.

Reasoning

The court found that the verification of who resides on which parcel was in the interest of all parties, since parallel allegations existed about occupation of parcels 558 and 490 and a discrepancy between adjudication records and mapping of parcel 490. To balance any advantage to the plaintiff, the court conditioned the orders on the applicant bearing the costs of both the application and the surveyor's exercise.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • The court can order a surveyor to visit suit land in deserving cases, and the applicant must demonstrate that the order is deserved; even if orders predominantly aid the applicant's proof, the court may grant them on terms as to costs.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.That the County Surveyor Trans-Nzoia County shall, in the presence of the local area Chief and Elders, visit land comprised in Title No. West Pokot/Chepareria/558 and 490 and ascertain (i) whether the plaintiff and defendant occupy parcel 558; (ii) whether there are physical marks/temporary boundaries separating them; (iii) how many acres each party occupies on parcel 558; (iv) whether the plaintiff or any family member occupies parcel 490 and how far parcel 558 is from 490; (v) whether the mapping of parcel 490 agrees with the adjudication records as to ground position
  2. 2.That the County Surveyor shall compile and file his report within 30 days from the date of the court's order
  3. 3.That the costs of the application and the costs of the exercise by the county surveyor shall be borne by the applicant

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Land Adjudication ActCap 284
Jurisdiction invoked
Inherent powers of the High Court to order a surveyor to visit suit land in a pending suit (civil procedure practice); no specific constitutional/statutory provision invoked

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kaboyi Merkor v County Land Adjudication & Settlement Officer, West Pokot County & 3 others [2019] KEELC 3540 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). . Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2019/3540/eng@2019-04-30

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.