Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedNot stated in the judgment· [2019] KEELC 3442 (KLR)

Archdiocese of Nairobi Kenya Registered Trustees v African Independent Pentecostal Church of Africa Registered Trustees [2019] KEELC 3442 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
7 May 2019
1,120 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Nairobi court cancelled a church's title deed and declared the Catholic Archdiocese the rightful owner of Ruiru land it had occupied since 1989.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The plaintiff, the Archdiocese of Nairobi Kenya Registered Trustees, sued the African Independent Pentecostal Church of Africa Registered Trustees claiming that its land, Ruiru/Mugutha Block 1/T.5323, had been fraudulently or erroneously registered in the defendant's name. The plaintiff pleaded that it bought the property from Nyakinyua Investment Limited in 1989, took possession and built a church on it, and sought a declaration of ownership, a permanent injunction, cancellation of the defendant's title deed issued on 5th March 1993, surrender of that title deed, and execution of transfer forms by the Deputy Registrar if necessary, plus costs. The defendant was served, including by substituted service through the Daily Nation or Standard newspapers, but neither entered appearance nor filed a defence, and the matter proceeded as an undefended cause. The plaintiff called three witnesses: the Chairlady of Nyakinyua Investment Limited, a former area councillor, and a third witness, who confirmed the allocation, possession and development of the property. Fourteen documents were produced, including allocation correspondence, purchase receipts, the defendant's title deed, correspondence from Nyakinyua and the District Officer, and an official search. The court found that the plaintiff had acquired the property in 1989 and had remained in possession, and that a proper evidential basis existed for rectification of the parcel register. Holding that the claim was proved on a balance of probabilities, the court granted the declaration, permanent injunction, cancellation and reissuance of title, surrender of the title deed, and execution of transfer forms by the Deputy Registrar of the Environment and Land Court. Because the defendant did not contest the claim, there was no order as to costs. Judgment was delivered at Nairobi on 7th May 2019 by B M Eboso, Judge.

Key legal issues

#
01

Rectification of the parcel register where the registered owner did not defend the suit

Holding

The plaintiff proved on a balance of probabilities that it acquired the suit property from Nyakinyua Investment Limited in 1989, took possession, developed it, and has remained in possession, warranting rectification of the register and cancellation of the defendant's title

Reasoning

The plaintiff called three witnesses, including the Chairlady of Nyakinyua Investment Limited, who confirmed the allocation to Ruiru Catholic Church and the erroneous registration of the defendant. Fourteen documents, including allocation correspondence, receipts and the title deed, were produced. The defendant, served by substituted service, neither entered appearance nor filed a defence. The court found an uncontroverted evidential basis for rectification.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Where a defendant does not contest a claim and the plaintiff lays an evidential basis through witnesses and documents, the court may grant rectification of the parcel register on a balance of probabilities

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Declaration that the plaintiff is the sole legal and rightful owner and/or proprietor of Parcel Number RUIRU/MUGUTHA BLOCK 1/T.5323 situated within Ruiru, Kiambu County
  2. 2.Permanent injunction against the defendant restraining it, its agents, representatives, servants or employees from entering, interfering, selling, transferring, transacting and or disposing off Parcel Number RUIRU/MUGUTHA BLOCK 1/T.5323
  3. 3.Order directing the Land Registrar, Thika Land Registry, to cancel and or revoke the title deed Number RUIRU/MUGUTHA BLOCK 1/T.5323 held by the defendant and issued on 5th March 1993 and issue a new title deed in favour of the plaintiff
  4. 4.Order directing the defendant to immediately surrender the title deed in respect of RUIRU/MUGUTHA BLOCK 1/T.5323 to the Land Registrar to facilitate the cancellation and or revocation
  5. 5.Order that in the event the defendant refuses to execute the transfer forms in favour of the plaintiff, the Deputy Registrar of the Environment and Land Court at Nairobi shall execute them on its behalf
  6. 6.No order as to costs
Jurisdiction invoked
Original jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court over land disputes; no specific constitutional or statutory provision cited in the judgment

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Archdiocese of Nairobi Kenya Registered Trustees v African Independent Pentecostal Church of Africa Registered Trustees [2019] KEELC 3442 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2019/3442/eng@2019-05-07

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.