Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNotice of Motion dated 5th June 2018 (suit over Nakuru Municipality/Block 9/31)· [2019] KEELC 3111 (KLR)

John Muthee Ngunjiri & 4 others (Registered trustees for and on behalf of Kenya African National Union Nakuru Branch) v Kenya Power & Lighting Co Ltd & another [2019] KEELC 3111 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
30 May 2019
936 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Nakuru court refused to stop an auction of land because it cannot overrule or block High Court orders — plaintiffs targeting the wrong court lose.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling by the Environment and Land Court at Nakuru (D. O. Ohungo, J) disposed of the plaintiffs' Notice of Motion dated 5th June 2018 seeking an interlocutory injunction to restrain the defendants from entering, selling, transferring, registering or interfering with Nakuru Municipality/Block 9/31 pending trial. The plaintiffs, through an affidavit of Silas Richard Mukolwe, asserted that KANU Nakuru Branch was the registered proprietor and that the 1st defendant had erroneously attached the property for public auction on 8th June 2018 under a decree in HCC No. 14 of 2004 (Milimani). The defendants, through a replying affidavit of Mellap Wataka of Hamilton Harrison & Mathews, acknowledged the decree and contended the attachment was lawful execution and that the ELC lacked jurisdiction to supervise High Court proceedings. Applying Giella v Cassman Brown and Nguruman, the court held that the injunction sought would stop execution of High Court orders; since Article 162(2) gives the ELC equal status and concurrent jurisdiction with the High Court, its judge cannot enquire into or stop High Court decisions, following Bellevue Development and Ng'ang'a Muiruri v Credit Bank. The applicants therefore failed to establish a prima facie case, and the remaining Giella limbs were not considered. The application was dismissed with costs to the defendants on 30th May 2019.

Key legal issues

#
01

Jurisdiction to restrain execution of a High Court decree

Holding

The court lacks jurisdiction to enquire into or stop orders and decisions made by a High Court judge, being of equal and concurrent status

Reasoning

Article 162(2) confers on the ELC the same status as the High Court, giving its judges concurrent jurisdiction. Relying on Bellevue Development and Ng'ang'a Muiruri v Credit Bank, a judge of concurrent jurisdiction cannot supervise fellow judges; any such decision is a nullity. Since the attachment was made pursuant to High Court orders in HCC No. 14 of 2004 (Milimani), the injunction sought would improperly stop execution of those orders and could not stand.

p. 2
02

Prima facie case under Giella

Holding

The applicants failed to establish a prima facie case, so the remaining Giella limbs need not be considered

Reasoning

Citing Nguruman Limited v Jan Bonde Nielsen, the three Giella conditions are sequential hurdles; if no prima facie case is established, irreparable injury and balance of convenience fall away. Because the plaintiffs' claim rested on an impermissible attempt to restrain High Court execution, it disclosed no prima facie case and the application necessarily failed at the first stage.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A judge of the Environment and Land Court, being of concurrent jurisdiction with the High Court, cannot supervise, review or restrain the orders and decisions of a High Court judge
  • A decision by a court purporting to review decisions of concurrent or superior jurisdiction is a nullity

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Notice of Motion dated 5th June 2018 is dismissed
  2. 2.Costs of the application awarded to the defendants
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2) of the Constitution (court of equal status with the High Court)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "John Muthee Ngunjiri & 4 others (Registered trustees for and on behalf of Kenya African National Union Nakuru Branch) v Kenya Power & Lighting Co Ltd & another [2019] KEELC 3111 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). Notice of Motion dated 5th June 2018 (suit over Nakuru Municipality/Block 9/31). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2019/3111/eng@2019-05-30

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.