Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCOtherOriginating Summons filed 13 November 2012 (number not stated in judgment)· [2019] KEELC 2731 (KLR)

Carol Construction Engineers Ltd v Naomi Chepkorir Langat [2019] KEELC 2731 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
20 June 2019
639 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is an interlocutory ruling by the Environment and Land Court at Nakuru in a long-running land dispute commenced by Originating Summons on 13 November 2012. The plaintiff, who acquired parcel Njoro/Ngata Block 2/130 through a chain beginning with a chargee's statutory power of sale by Kenya Commercial Bank to Martha Moraa Mayieka and a subsequent transfer, sought a declaration of absolute ownership, a permanent injunction against the defendant (wife of the former owner Joel Kimitet Langat), and damages of Kshs. 4,250,000/= for alleged malicious destruction of property. By an application dated 15 September 2017, the defendant sought to enjoin Joel Kimitet Langat, Kenya Commercial Bank and Martha Moraa Mayieka as co-defendants. Service difficulties arose because Ms. Moraa, said to be in the United Kingdom, could not be traced at her last known address, and counsel for the defendant sought to serve by newspaper advertisement. The plaintiff opposed, urging that the application was meant to frustrate the hearing of the main suit. The court held that a proposed party must be heard before being added, and that the defendant could not be faulted for failing to trace Ms. Moraa. Noting that the suit land is in Kenya and Ms. Moraa's whereabouts are unknown, the judge directed substituted service of the hearing notice by advertisement in the Daily Nation or Standard newspaper and fixed the joinder application for an inter partes hearing. No costs order was made.

Key legal issues

#
01

Mode of service where a proposed party cannot be traced

Holding

The court directed substituted service by newspaper advertisement, reasoning that the defendant could not be faulted for being unable to trace Ms. Moraa whose whereabouts are unknown.

Reasoning

The court noted that attempts at personal service by courier at Ms. Moraa's last known physical address in the UK had failed, and that it was unclear whether she was in Kenya, the UK or elsewhere. Since the suit land is located in Kenya, the court directed that the hearing notice be served by advertisement in the Daily Nation or Standard newspaper, then fixed the application for inter partes hearing.

p. 2
02

Right to be heard before joinder of a party

Holding

The court affirmed that a proposed party must be heard before being added to a suit, which is why the joinder application had to be heard inter partes.

Reasoning

The judge declined to dispose of the joinder application without hearing the proposed parties, holding that service upon them was necessary. The plaintiff's complaint that the application was dilatory did not displace this requirement, though the court pressed for a hearing date so the application would not further delay the main suit.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Before any party is added to a suit, that party needs to be heard on the application for joinder.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.That service of the hearing notice upon Martha Moraa Mayieka be effected by way of advertisement either in the Daily Nation or Standard newspaper
  2. 2.That a hearing date be given for the application dated 15 September 2017 and service be effected as directed
Jurisdiction invoked
Environment and Land Court jurisdiction over the land parcel Njoro/Ngata Block 2/130 (statutory basis not expressly cited in the judgment)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Carol Construction Engineers Ltd v Naomi Chepkorir Langat [2019] KEELC 2731 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). Originating Summons filed 13 November 2012 (number not stated in judgment). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2019/2731/eng@2019-06-20

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.