Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNot stated in the excerpt provided· [2019] KEELC 2461 (KLR)

Tebere Concrete Company Limited v Dickson Macharia Gichuhi [2019] KEELC 2461 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
28 June 2019
612 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~2 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The court dismissed the defendant's attempt to throw out a land ownership suit, ruling that disputed facts can't be decided through a preliminary objection and must be tested at a full hearing.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The plaintiff sued in the Environment and Land Court at Kerugoya seeking a declaration that he is the owner of P/NO. 1617 Wachoro, an order compelling the defendant to remove a perimeter fence on the property, and an injunction restraining the defendant, his agents and servants from interfering with his quiet possession of the suit land. The defendant filed a defence and a Preliminary Objection on four grounds: that Morris Njage & Co. Advocates, having previously acted for the defendant and drawn the sale agreement between the parties, should not act for the plaintiff; that the suit was defective; that the plaintiff lacked capacity to sue; and that the sub-judice rule applied. The court framed two issues: representation and sub-judice/defective suit. On representation, the objection became academic because the objected-to firm filed a Notice to cease acting and a new firm came on record by Notice of change; the issue was deemed a non-issue. On the remaining ground, the defendant contended that no authority or consent was obtained under Section 30 of the Land Adjudication Act, rendering the suit defective. The court held, applying the decisions of Odunga J and Munyao Sila J, that a Preliminary Objection lies on pure points of law and undisputed facts; where facts are contested, evidence must be adduced at the hearing and the court cannot determine conflicting factual averments within a Preliminary Objection. The objection was accordingly dismissed with costs, allowing the suit to proceed to hearing.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether a Preliminary Objection premised on want of consent/authority under Section 30 of the Land Adjudication Act can be determined where the underlying facts are disputed

Holding

It cannot; such an objection is out of the ambit of a Preliminary Objection and must await the hearing when evidence is adduced

Reasoning

The court applied the established principle that Preliminary Objections are raised on pure points of law on undisputed facts. Where the factual basis of the objection - here whether authority or consent under Section 30 of the Land Adjudication Act was obtained - is contested, the court cannot resolve the dispute without evidence. The objection, if entertained, would invite determination of conflicting factual averments and unnecessarily prolong proceedings. The issue therefore has to wait for the hearing, and the objection was dismissed with costs.

p. 2
02

Whether the objection to the plaintiff's advocate continuing to act remained live

Holding

The issue became moot because the advocate filed a Notice to cease acting and a new firm filed a Notice of change

Reasoning

The defendant objected to Morris Njage & Co. Advocates acting for the plaintiff on the ground that the firm had previously acted for the defendant and drawn the sale agreement. Before determination, that firm filed a Notice to cease acting and a new firm of Advocates came on record by Notice of change. The objection was therefore rendered academic and was deemed a non-issue, leaving only the sub-judice/defective suit ground for determination.

p. 1

Legal principles established

#
  • A Preliminary Objection must rest on pure points of law and undisputed facts; where facts are disputed, the matter must proceed to hearing so that evidence can be adduced

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The plaintiff's advocate-objection issue was deemed a non-issue following the Notice to cease acting and Notice of change of advocates
  2. 2.The Preliminary Objection raised by the defendant is dismissed with costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Land Adjudication ActSection 30

Cases cited (2)

  • Republic Vs Attorney General (Suing for and on behalf of the Ministry of Lands) & 2 others Ex-parte South and Central (Thika) Investments Limited & another
    (2016) e K.L.R
  • Lemitei Ole Koros & another Vs Attorney General & 3 others
    (2016) e K.L.R
Jurisdiction invoked
Original civil jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court over disputes relating to land (suit land P/NO. 1617 Wachoro, within a Land Adjudication area under the Land Adjudication Act)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Tebere Concrete Company Limited v Dickson Macharia Gichuhi [2019] KEELC 2461 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). Not stated in the excerpt provided. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2019/2461/eng@2019-06-28

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.