Philip Kiptanui Rugut & 2 others v National Environment Management Authority & 3 others [2019] KEELC 2402 (KLR)
The bottom line
#What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether the ELC has jurisdiction despite the alternative remedy before the National Environment Tribunal
The ELC has jurisdiction because the reliefs sought exceed the Tribunal's powers and the 60-day statutory appeal window under section 129 EMCA has expired with no provision for extension, constituting special circumstances.
The court considered the reliefs sought, including declarations of constitutional violations and cancellation of licences, and found they cannot all be granted by the Tribunal. The EIA licence was issued in March 2017, so the 60-day period to appeal to the Tribunal under section 129 EMCA had lapsed, and rule 7 of the NET procedure rules prohibits extension of time. EMCA therefore could not provide an adequate and efficacious remedy, and the proper forum is the ELC with unlimited original and appellate jurisdiction over environment and land matters.
Whether failure to give the 30-day notice under section 13A of the Government Proceedings Act is fatal
It is not fatal; the requirement, applied strictly to the 47 county governments, impedes access to justice and is inconsistent with the Constitution.
Relying on Nyandoche Ibere Cooperative Society v County Government of Kisii, which cited Kenya Bus Service Ltd, the court adopted Majanja J's finding that section 13A of the GPA was enacted when there was only one national government and was never amended to conform with the 2010 Constitution; it diminishes the citizen's ability to seek relief against the Government and violates article 48. The court fully associated itself with those decisions and held non-compliance does not render the Petition incurably defective.
What constitutes a proper preliminary objection
Only the jurisdiction ground and the section 13A notice ground qualified as preliminary objections under the Mukisa Biscuit definition.
The court adopted the classic Mukisa Biscuit formulation: a preliminary objection is a pure point of law argued on the assumption that all facts pleaded by the other side are correct, and cannot be raised if any fact has to be ascertained or if the exercise of judicial discretion is sought. Viewed against that definition, only two of the grounds in the Notice of Preliminary Objection qualified: the question of jurisdiction and whether failure to comply with section 13A of the Government Proceedings Act renders the Petition fatally defective.
Legal principles established
#- Where the reliefs sought go beyond the jurisdiction of the National Environment Tribunal and the statutory appeal window under section 129 EMCA has lapsed with no provision for extension, special circumstances exist warranting the filing of the Petition in the Environment and Land Court.
- Failure to issue the 30-day notice under section 13A of the Government Proceedings Act does not render a Petition against a county government fatally defective, the provision being an impediment to access to justice inconsistent with the 2010 Constitution.
Court orders
#- 1.The Notice of Preliminary Objection is dismissed
- 2.No order as to costs
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution of Kenya 2010 and sections 13 and 30 of the Environment and Land Court Act
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Philip Kiptanui Rugut & 2 others v National Environment Management Authority & 3 others [2019] KEELC 2402 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). Petition dated 13th May 2019 (Kericho). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2019/2402/eng@2019-07-12
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.