Joseph Gikunda Kiara v Rafiki Micro Finance Bank Ltd & another [2019] KEELC 2271 (KLR)
The bottom line
#What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Extension of time to file Notice of Appeal under Section 7 of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act
The application was allowed; time enlarged and leave granted to file the Notice of Appeal out of time
The court found that notice of the rescheduled ruling date was sent by email by the Deputy Registrar but was not received by either party's advocates, and the ruling was delivered in the absence of all parties and counsel. The court held that since notice was not personally served on the Plaintiff's advocate, the Plaintiff laid a basis for failing to file the Notice of Appeal within fourteen days. The application was filed within four months, which the court found not to be unreasonable delay, and refusal would prejudice the Plaintiff's constitutional right of appeal.
Legal principles established
#- Where a ruling is delivered in the absence of the parties without personal service of notice of the delivery date, an applicant who files an extension application within a few months has explained the delay and should not be denied the constitutional right of appeal
Court orders
#- 1.Time within which the Plaintiff ought to file the Notice of Appeal against the Ruling delivered on 2nd November, 2017 enlarged
- 2.Leave granted to the Plaintiff to file his Notice of Appeal out of time
- 3.Plaintiff to file his Notice of Appeal within fourteen (14) days of the date of the Ruling
- 4.Each party to bear his/its own costs
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Section 7 of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Joseph Gikunda Kiara v Rafiki Micro Finance Bank Ltd & another [2019] KEELC 2271 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). Notice of Motion dated 1st March, 2018. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2019/2271/eng@2019-07-19
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.