Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedELC Misc Application No. 35 of 2018 (Formerly Machakos Misc. Application No. 134 of 2014)· [2019] KEELC 2169 (KLR)

Simon Salaon Pertet & another v County Land Registrar, Kajiado & another; Peterson Ndungu Marira & 2 others (Interested Parties) [2019] KEELC 2169 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
25 July 2019
2,860 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~11 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court ordered the Kajiado Land Registrar to demarcate disputed land boundaries within 90 days after eight years of inaction.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was a judicial review application by Notice of Motion dated 27th October 2014, brought under section 8 of the Law Reform Act and Order 53 of the Civil Procedure Rules, in which Simon Salaon Pertet and Elizabeth Pertet sought an order of mandamus compelling the County Land Registrar, Kajiado, to demarcate and place boundary marks on LR Kajiado/Kaputiei North/2234, 2233 and 2232, with supervision of enforcement by the Police County Commander, Kajiado. The applicants and interested parties (the registered proprietors of the three parcels) averred that the parent title Kajiado/North Kaputiei/1107 was subdivided in 1993; that in 1999 a neighbouring parcel (4546, whose parent was 2235) was allegedly falsified on paper to expand from 17.55 Ha to 28.07 Ha, annexing part of the applicants' parcel 2234; and that the absence of beacons exposed all the parcels to encroachment. By a letter dated 19th July 2011 the applicants asked the Land Registrar to fix the boundaries but no action was taken. The respondents, though served, did not appear or respond, so the court found the averments uncontroverted. Relying on sections 18 and 19 of the Land Registration Act, 2012, which vest the mandate to fix boundaries in the Registrar before courts may entertain boundary disputes, and on the Gathenji mandamus principles, the court held the Registrar owed and breached a public duty. Mandamus was granted with a 90-day deadline, Police County Commander supervision, and each party bearing their own costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Land Registrar Kajiado owed a public duty to demarcate the boundaries of the suit parcels and whether mandamus should issue for the failure to perform it

Holding

Mandamus issued because the Registrar, having a statutory duty under sections 18 and 19 of the Land Registration Act, failed to act on the applicants' request of 19th July 2011

Reasoning

Sections 18 and 19 of the Land Registration Act vest the mandate to fix boundaries in the Land Registrar, and the court cannot entertain a boundary dispute before such determination. The applicants and interested parties are registered proprietors who notified the Registrar in July 2011 of a boundary dispute but no action was taken. The court relied on the Gathenji principles that mandamus lies to compel performance of a public duty, and held that declining mandamus would leave the parties without an effective remedy.

p. 3
02

Whether the applicants and interested parties were entitled to the judicial review orders sought

Holding

The application was found merited and mandamus was granted

Reasoning

The respondents, though duly served, did not enter appearance or respond, so the averments were uncontroverted. Ownership of the parcels was not disputed, the 2011 official search and RIM map tallied with the 1993 mutations, and a private surveyor's report indicated encroachment. Associating with the cited authorities, the court held the applicants entitled to mandamus.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An order of mandamus compels the performance of a public duty imposed by statute where the person or body has failed to perform the duty to the detriment of a party with a legal right to expect performance
  • Sections 18 and 19 of the Land Registration Act give the Land Registrar the legal mandate to determine boundaries before a court can entertain any boundary dispute

Court orders

#
  1. 1.An order of mandamus issued directing the Land Registrar Kajiado, through the office of the Honourable Attorney General, to demarcate and put boundary marks on LR KAJIADO/KAPUTIEI NORTH/2234, 2233 and 2232 within 90 days from the date of the order
  2. 2.The Police County Commander, Kajiado County to supervise the enforcement of the order of mandamus
  3. 3.Each party to bear their own costs
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 8 of the Law Reform Act and Order 53 Rule 1(1), (2), (3) and (4) of the Civil Procedure Rules (judicial review)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Simon Salaon Pertet & another v County Land Registrar, Kajiado & another; Peterson Ndungu Marira & 2 others (Interested Parties) [2019] KEELC 2169 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). ELC Misc Application No. 35 of 2018 (Formerly Machakos Misc. Application No. 134 of 2014). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2019/2169/eng@2019-07-25

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.