Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCOtherELC Case No. 308 of 2018 (Machakos)· [2019] KEELC 2009 (KLR)

Henry Kipkosgei Serem v Erdemann Property Ltd & another [2019] KEELC 2009 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
26 July 2019
1,072 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court ruled that similar disputes by different resident groups are not duplicate cases, so both suits can continue.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This Ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Machakos (O.A. Angote, J) dealt with a Notice of Preliminary Objection dated 11th November 2018 filed by the 1st Defendant, and supported by the 2nd Defendant, in a suit by the Chairman of the Greatwall Apartments Phase I Residents Association. The Plaintiff sought a permanent injunction restraining the Defendants from interfering with the Waste Water Treatment Plant on L.R. No. 12715/6322 and a mandatory injunction compelling the 1st Defendant to transfer the reversionary interest in L.R. No. 12715/450. The Defendants objected that the suit was sub judice Nairobi HCCC No. 55 of 2016 (John Kieti Makila v Erdemann Property Limited, now Machakos ELC No. 35 of 2019), that it breached Sections 119 and 121 of the Water Act, and that it was an abuse of process. The court held that the parties in the two suits were not the same - the earlier suit was brought for Phase III residents, while this Plaintiff acts for Phase I residents and is not a signatory to the earlier authority - and that the Plaintiff was not litigating under the same title. The suit was therefore not sub judice. The Water Act ground was not argued. The court observed that the issues overlap and suggested a test suit or consolidation. The preliminary objection was dismissed with no order as to costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the suit is sub judice Nairobi HCCC No. 55 of 2016 (Machakos ELC No. 35 of 2019) under Section 6 of the Civil Procedure Act

Holding

The preliminary objection on sub judice fails because the parties are not the same and the Plaintiff is not litigating under the same title, notwithstanding that the issues in the two suits are the same.

Reasoning

The court compared the parties: the Nairobi/Machakos suit was filed by the residents of Greatwall Apartments Phase III through John Kieti Makila, while this suit was filed by the Chairman of the Greatwall Apartments Phase I Residents Association. The Plaintiff here is neither a signatory to the letter of authority in the other suit nor a Phase III resident. Different parties and different titles defeat sub judice under Section 6, even where the issues overlap.

p. 2
02

Whether the suit breaches Sections 119 and 121 of the Water Act No. 43 of 2016

Holding

The objection under the Water Act failed because the Defendants did not submit on it.

Reasoning

Counsel for the 1st Defendant asserted in the notice of preliminary objection that the suit breached the procedure in Sections 119 and 121 of the Water Act, but in written submissions no argument was advanced on that ground. An unargued ground of objection cannot succeed.

p. 1
03

Case management where two suits raise the same issues but are not sub judice each other

Holding

The court recommended that one suit be used as a test suit or that the two suits be consolidated for the convenience of the parties.

Reasoning

Although the sub judice objection failed, the court recognised the substantial overlap in issues concerning the Waste Water Treatment Plant on L.R. No. 12715/6322. As a practical measure it suggested a test suit or consolidation, but this was not a binding direction in the final order.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A suit is not sub judice under Section 6 of the Civil Procedure Act where the parties and the title under which they litigate differ, even if the subject matter or issues are similar

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Dismissal of the Plaintiff's Notice of Preliminary Objection dated 11th November, 2018 with no order as to costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure ActSection 6
  • Water ActSections 119, 121

Cases cited (1)

  • John Kieti Makila vs. Erdemann Property Limited and Mavoko Water and Sewerage Company
    Nairobi HCCC No. 55 of 2016; Machakos ELC No. 35 of 2019
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution establishing the Environment and Land Court (as the court seized of a land dispute); no specific provision cited in the Ruling

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Henry Kipkosgei Serem v Erdemann Property Ltd & another [2019] KEELC 2009 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). ELC Case No. 308 of 2018 (Machakos). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2019/2009/eng@2019-07-26

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.