Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedAppeal in respect of Minister's Land Dispute Appeal No. 29 of 1997· [2019] KEELC 1916 (KLR)

Nthusi Mwonewa (Deceased) v Makau Mwonewa (Environment and Land Appeal 91 of 2005) [2019] KEELC 1916 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
19 July 2019
770 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court confirmed that once a land appeal is struck out, no orders can be made in it; the winner must file a fresh suit.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Respondent/Applicant, who had been adjudged by the Minister in Land Dispute Appeal No. 29 of 1997 the rightful owner of parcel number 2598 Ngiini Adjudication Section, brought a Notice of Motion dated 10th February 2014 seeking to have the late Appellant's widow and sons declared executors de son tort, joined to the Appeal for execution of the decree, removed from the suit land, and enforced against by the O.C.S Machakos Police Station. The named persons filed a preliminary objection arguing that the Appeal had been struck out on 3rd December 2009 as incompetent, leaving no suit on which the application could be founded, and that they were not the deceased's legal representatives nor executors de son tort. The court noted that the Appeal, filed by way of a Memorandum of Appeal dated 28th November 2005 challenging the Minister's findings, had been struck out suo moto by Lenaola J. on 3rd December 2009, that judge having observed that under Section 29 of the Land Adjudication Act the Minister's decision is final and no appeal lies to any court. Angote J. held that with the appeal struck out, the applicant could not execute the Minister's order in a non-existent suit, nor substitute the deceased appellant by his legal representatives. The only remaining recourse was costs of the struck-out suit, or an independent suit to execute the Minister's order, subject to limitation of time. The application was dismissed with no order as to costs, and it was confirmed that the Appeal stands struck out as ordered on 3rd December 2009.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether orders sought in the Notice of Motion dated 10th February 2014 could be granted in a struck-out appeal

Holding

The application was dismissed because the appeal was struck out and no longer existed as a suit

Reasoning

The court found that the appeal had been struck out suo moto by Lenaola J. on 3rd December 2009 as incompetent, the Minister's decision under Section 29 of the Land Adjudication Act being final. With no subsisting suit, substitution of the deceased appellant by legal representatives and execution of the Minister's orders were impossible; the applicant's only remaining recourse was costs of the struck-out suit or an independent suit.

p. 2
02

Whether the named persons could be made parties as executors de son tort

Holding

The issue of substitution could not arise where the suit had been struck out

Reasoning

The court held that the question of substituting the deceased appellant by his legal representatives could not arise in a suit that no longer existed. The objection that the named persons were not legal representatives and had not intermeddled was superseded by the more fundamental point that there were no proceedings to which they could be joined.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Under Section 29 of the Land Adjudication Act, the Minister's decision is final and no appeal lies to the High Court or any other court or legal authority
  • Once an appeal is struck out, no execution or substitution of parties can occur on it; the decree-holder must file an independent suit subject to limitation of time

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Application dated 10th February, 2014 is dismissed with no order as to costs
  2. 2.For avoidance of doubt, the Appeal stands struck out as ordered by the court on 3rd December, 2009

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Land Adjudication ActSection 29
On appeal from
District Commissioner Machakos (Minister's Appeal No. 29 of 1997)
29 of 1997
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 29 of the Land Adjudication Act (as invoked by Lenaola J. in striking out the appeal)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Nthusi Mwonewa (Deceased) v Makau Mwonewa (Environment and Land Appeal 91 of 2005) [2019] KEELC 1916 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). Appeal in respect of Minister's Land Dispute Appeal No. 29 of 1997. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2019/1916/eng@2019-07-19

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.