Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedMombasa ELC Misc? - Notice of motion dated 18th October 2018 (suit by Originating Summons dated 21st December 2016)· [2019] KEELC 1820 (KLR)

Micheal Thoya Mbwana v Hussein Karimbhai Anjarwalla [2019] KEELC 1820 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
5 July 2019
810 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court ruled that a land lawsuit filed against a man who had died 25 years earlier was legally void from the start, dismissing it with costs to his estate.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The applicant, Salim Anjarwalla, administrator ad litem of the estate of Hussein Karimbhai Anjarwalla (appointed by the High Court in Mombasa High Court Succession Cause No. 118 of 1989 on 18th September 2018), moved the court by notice of motion dated 18th October 2018 under Order 40, Order 2 rule 15(1) and Order 51 of the Civil Procedure Rules and sections 1A, 1B and 63(e) of the Civil Procedure Act. He sought setting aside of a consent order recorded on 21st November 2017 (comprised in a letter dated 25th July 2017) and the decree of 18th January 2018, striking out of the Originating Summons dated 21st December 2016, dismissal of the suit, and costs. His case was that the defendant, Hussein Karimbhai Anjarwalla, died on 19th February 1989, as evidenced by a death certificate, and therefore could not have executed the sale agreement of 21st July 1989 underpinning the plaintiff's adverse-possession claim over plot 859/I/MN, appointed advocates, or filed a defence; suing him personally rather than his estate rendered the suit a nullity and a fraud on the estate. The defendant's former advocate deposed that he was instructed by 'Hussein Karimbhai Anjarwalla' in September 2018 and lost contact; the plaintiff alleged the grant was obtained by misrepresentation but produced no evidence. The court found the suit, filed some 25 years after the defendant's death and not against his estate, was a nullity ab initio, and that orders made in such a suit are automatically set aside once the irregularity is raised. Allowing the application in terms of prayers 4, 5, 6 and 7, the court set aside the consent order and decree, struck out the Originating Summons and supporting affidavit, dismissed the suit with costs to the estate, and awarded costs of the application to the applicant. Judgment delivered at Mombasa on 5th July 2019 by A. Omollo, Judge.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the suit against a deceased defendant was a nullity

Holding

Yes; the death certificate proved the defendant died on 19th February 1989, some 25 years before the suit was filed, and no evidence countered it

Reasoning

The applicant annexed a death certificate showing the defendant died on 19th February 1989 and a High Court order appointing him administrator ad litem. The plaintiff alleged the grant was obtained by misrepresentation but produced no documentary evidence. The suit, filed on 22nd December 2016 against a person long deceased and not sued through his estate, was a nullity ab initio.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A suit filed against a deceased person who was never substituted by his estate is a nullity ab initio, and once the irregularity is brought to the court's attention any orders made in the suit are automatically set aside

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Set aside and/or discharge the consent order comprised in the letter dated 25th July 2017 recorded in court on 21st November 2017 and the decree issued in the suit on 18th January 2018
  2. 2.Struck out the Originating Summons dated 21st December 2016 and the supporting affidavit of the plaintiff sworn on 22nd December 2016
  3. 3.Suit dismissed with costs to the estate of the late Hussein Karimbhai Anjarwalla
  4. 4.Costs of the application awarded to the applicant

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 40
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 2 rule 15(1)
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 51
  • Civil Procedure Actsection 1A
  • Civil Procedure Actsection 1B
  • Civil Procedure Actsection 63(e)
  • Limitation of Actions Actnull
Jurisdiction invoked
Order 40, Order 2 rule 15(1) and Order 51 of the Civil Procedure Rules; sections 1A, 1B and 63(e) of the Civil Procedure Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Micheal Thoya Mbwana v Hussein Karimbhai Anjarwalla [2019] KEELC 1820 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). Mombasa ELC Misc? - Notice of motion dated 18th October 2018 (suit by Originating Summons dated 21st December 2016). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2019/1820/eng@2019-07-05

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.