Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedKerugoya ELC Civil Suit arising from plaint dated 31st July 2018 (number not stated in judgment)· [2019] KEELC 1577 (KLR)

Thomas Ndwiga Njogu & 6 others v Peris Wanjira Muriithi (Sued as Legal representative of the Estate of Patrick Muriithi Njogu – DCD) [2019] KEELC 1577 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
20 September 2019
1,004 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court ruled that land registered in an eldest brother's name was held in trust for his siblings under Kikuyu customary law, and ordered it transferred to them.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The plaintiffs, siblings of the late Patrick Muriithi Njogu, sued the defendant, the deceased's widow, by plaint dated 31st July 2018. They sought declarations that the deceased held parcel No. NGARIAMA/THIRIKWA/481 in trust for himself and the plaintiffs, with a 7/8 share to be transferred to the plaintiffs in equal shares, and that he held parcel No. NGARIAMA/THIRIKWA/1524 in trust for the 4th plaintiff, Geoffrey Muriuki Njogu, who purchased it in 1997 from one Mariko Njuki. The 1st plaintiff testified that the parcels were registered in the name of the deceased, the eldest brother, pursuant to a family arrangement and Kikuyu Customary Law, and that the family settled on parcel 481 in 1972 after a funds drive organised by their grandfather Samuel Karuga. The 4th plaintiff testified that he developed parcel 1524 and that the deceased's widow later filed two succession causes intended to disinherit the dependants. The defendant filed a defence and counter-claim through Ndegwa & Ndegwa Advocates but did not attend the hearing and tendered no evidence. The court found that the trust arose from the plaintiffs' possession and occupation of the suit properties and from Kikuyu Customary Law, under which land was registered in the name of the first born son to hold in trust for himself and his siblings. On a balance of probability, the plaintiffs proved their claim. Judgment was entered for the plaintiffs as prayed in the plaint, with the defendant ordered to bear the costs of the suit.

Key legal issues

#
01

Existence of a customary law trust over the suit parcels

Holding

The deceased held the suit properties in trust for himself and his siblings, including the plaintiffs

Reasoning

The plaintiffs laid foundation showing the suit properties were registered in the name of Patrick Muriithi Njogu (deceased), their eldest brother, to hold in trust for himself and his siblings. The trust arose both from the plaintiffs' possession and occupation of the suit properties and from Kikuyu Customary Law requiring registration in the name of the first born son for the benefit of his siblings. The defendant tendered no evidence to rebut this, so the court was satisfied on a balance of probability.

p. 2
02

Whether the plaintiffs proved their claim to a share of the suit properties

Holding

Yes; the plaintiffs proved their case on a balance of probability and were entitled to judgment as prayed

Reasoning

The court evaluated the testimonies of the 1st and 4th plaintiffs and their two witnesses together with the documents tendered. Their evidence established the trust and the entitlement to a share of the properties. Since the defendant did not attend court or tender any evidence disputing the plaintiffs' evidence on the acreage, the plaintiffs' claim stood uncontroverted and was proved on a balance of probability.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Under Kikuyu Customary Law, land was registered in the name of the first born son to hold in trust for himself and his siblings, and such trust is enforceable in court
  • A trust in land may be established by evidence of possession and occupation together with the circumstances of registration, proved on a balance of probability

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Judgment entered for the plaintiffs against the defendant as prayed in the plaint
  2. 2.Declaration that Patrick Muriithi Njogu (deceased) held parcel No. NGARIAMA/THIRIKWA/481 in trust for himself and the plaintiffs, with 7/8 share to be transferred to the plaintiffs in equal shares
  3. 3.Declaration that Patrick Muriithi Njogu (deceased) held parcel No. NGARIAMA/THIRIKWA/1524 in trust for the 4th plaintiff, Geoffrey Muriuki Njogu, to be transferred and registered in his name
  4. 4.Defendant to bear the costs of the suit
Jurisdiction invoked
Original jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court under Article 162(2) of the Constitution (land and environment), suit commenced by plaint

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Thomas Ndwiga Njogu & 6 others v Peris Wanjira Muriithi (Sued as Legal representative of the Estate of Patrick Muriithi Njogu – DCD) [2019] KEELC 1577 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). Kerugoya ELC Civil Suit arising from plaint dated 31st July 2018 (number not stated in judgment). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2019/1577/eng@2019-09-20

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.