Njiru Micheni Nthiga (Suing as a legal representative and Administrator of the Estate of the Deceased Leonard R.I. Nthiga) v Governor, Tharaka Nithi County Government & 5 others [2019] KEELC 919 (KLR)
The bottom line
#Kenya's Environment and Land Court confirmed it can hear land disputes of any value, and struck down an attempt to move a Kshs. 15 million case to a lower court.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether the ELC lacks pecuniary jurisdiction because the suit property is valued at Kshs. 15,437,000, within the jurisdiction of the Chief Magistrate's Court under section 7 of the Magistrates' Courts Act
The preliminary objection on jurisdiction failed; the ELC has unlimited original jurisdiction in land disputes and section 7 does not oust it
Section 7 of the Magistrates' Courts Act merely confers pecuniary limits on the various cadres of magistracy; it nowhere ousts the jurisdiction of the ELC. Article 162 grants the ELC equality of status with the High Court, which enjoys unlimited original jurisdiction in civil matters. Section 13(1) of the ELC Act gives the court original and appellate jurisdiction over all land and environment disputes under Article 162(2)(b). The court also noted it may transfer a suit to a subordinate court under section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act where necessary.
Whether the defendants' preliminary objection grounds 3, 4 and 5 raised pure points of law
They did not; they were argumentative and dismissed
Applying the classic definition in Mukisa Biscuits, a preliminary objection must raise a pure point of law argued on the assumption that all facts pleaded by the other side are correct. Grounds 3, 4 and 5, which alleged the plaintiff built on a road reserve without approvals and could not establish a prima facie case, required ascertainment of facts and merits. Ground 6 was nebulous and raised issues needing canvassing in the main suit.
Whether the 3rd defendant (MCA Magumoni Ward) is properly sued
Not definitively determined; the plaintiff's oral application to exclude the 3rd defendant's name was allowed by the court's directions of 25th March 2019, but the substantive suit continued with the issue canvassed in submissions
The court directed parties to address whether the 3rd defendant was properly sued. The 3rd defendant argued no specific allegations were levelled against him, the constitutional duty lies with the state, and orders could not vest against him. The plaintiff opposed, citing particulars of his conduct including holding a baraza and directing marking of the suit property for demolition. The ruling's final orders, however, dealt only with the preliminary objection on jurisdiction, and no express order on the 3rd defendant's removal appears in the disposition.
Legal principles established
#- The ELC, having the same status as the High Court under Article 162, has unlimited original jurisdiction in civil land and environment disputes, and section 7 of the Magistrates' Courts Act does not oust that jurisdiction
- Where a court lacks jurisdiction it must down its tools immediately
- Grounds that require facts to be ascertained or that are argumentative cannot sustain a preliminary objection
Court orders
#- 1.Grounds 1 and 2 of the Notice of Preliminary Objection dismissed
- 2.Grounds 3, 4 and 5 dismissed as argumentative and not pure points of law
- 3.Ground 6 dismissed as nebulous
- 4.The Notice of Preliminary Objection dismissed in its entirety
- 5.Costs of the Preliminary Objection awarded to the plaintiff
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution as read with section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Njiru Micheni Nthiga (Suing as a legal representative and Administrator of the Estate of the Deceased Leonard R.I. Nthiga) v Governor, Tharaka Nithi County Government & 5 others [2019] KEELC 919 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). ELC Case (Chuka) – suit filed 27th February 2019. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2019/919/eng@2019-11-13
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.