Elijah Nderitu Gachaga v Francis Gakuu Gachaga & 2 others [2019] KEELC 773 (KLR)
The bottom line
#A Kenyan court dismissed a land suit because the plaintiff's limited 'ad colligenda' grant only allowed him to preserve the estate, not to sue.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether a grant ad colligenda bona confers locus standi to sue
No. The grant is limited to collecting, getting in, receiving and preserving the estate; the Plaintiff's grant was not tailored to include filing suit and was never rectified, so he lacked locus and the suit was a nullity
Section 54 of the Law of Succession Act and section 67(1), read with Rule 36 of the Probate and Administration Rules, confine an ad colligenda grant to collection and preservation of assets of a perishable or precarious nature where a full grant cannot be made at once. Filing suit requires either a full grant or a limited grant ad litem under paragraph 14 of the Fifth Schedule. The wording of the grant is decisive: the Plaintiff's grant contained no language permitting institution of suit and there was no evidence of rectification. Following Morjaria v Abdalla and Julian Adoyo Ongunga, the Plaintiff was not clothed with locus, rendering all proceedings a nullity per Macfoy v United Africa Co.
Whether the objection was a true preliminary objection on a point of law
Yes. It required no investigation of facts or exercise of discretion
Applying Mukhisa Biscuit and Oraro v Mbaja, the court held that the question whether the Plaintiff's grant empowered him to sue was determinable from the pleadings and the record without evidence. Although the facts in plaint and defence were disputed, the objection itself rested purely on the terms of the grant, a matter of law capable of disposing of the suit without calling for disputed facts or judicial discretion.
Whether the ELC's jurisdiction was ousted because the grant can only be challenged in the Succession Court
No. The issue was characterised as one of locus to bring suit, not an impugning or revocation of the grant
The Plaintiff argued that sections 47 and 48 of the Law of Succession Act vest jurisdiction over grants in the High Family Court. The court held the objection did not seek to strike out, impugn or revoke the grant but raised the antecedent question of whether the Plaintiff had capacity to sue in the ELC. Characterised that way, the court's jurisdiction was not ousted, though it noted revocation of the grant belongs to the Succession Court.
Whether Morjaria v Abdalla and Peter Owade Ogwang are in conflict
No. Both decisions agree that an ad colligenda grant is not the appropriate grant to confer locus to sue; their differing outcomes turned on grants specifically tailored for suit or appeal
The Plaintiff urged the court to elect between the two Court of Appeal decisions. The court found no conflict: in Morjaria the grant was expressly limited to filing an appeal and substitution was allowed in an ongoing case; in Owade Ogwang a chamber summons had already been allowed by a judge of concurrent jurisdiction. Both benches reiterated the point of law that ad colligenda grants do not clothe a party with locus to sue unless specifically stated in the grant.
Legal principles established
#- A grant of letters of administration ad colligenda bona is limited to collection and preservation of the estate and does not confer locus standi to institute a suit unless expressly tailored to include the filing of suit
- Locus standi is not a technicality; proceedings instituted by a party without it are a nullity
- A preliminary objection must be a pure point of law, not blurred with disputed facts
Court orders
#- 1.The Preliminary Objection is allowed as merited
- 2.The suit is declared incompetent and is dismissed
- 3.The Defendants are awarded the costs of the suit
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Original jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court under Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution (suit concerning title to land of a deceased estate); the court found its jurisdiction was not ousted
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Later judgments citing this (17)
#Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.
- Carling (Suing as administrator of the Estate of Mona Ingegard Bjorklund) v Apoko alias Ringtone (Land Case E354 of 2021) [2025] KEELC 8505 (KLR)[2025] KEELC 8505 (KLR)4 Dec 2025
- Carling (Suing as administrator of the Estate of Mona Ingegard Bjorklund) v Apoko alias Ringtone (Land Case E354 of 2021) [2025] KEELC 8505 (KLR)[2025] KEELC 8505 (KLR)4 Dec 2025
- Chesang & 3 others v Sirma & 4 others (Environment and Land Case 18, 048 & 24 of 2020 (Consolidated)) [2025] KEELC 7310 (KLR)[2025] KEELC 7310 (KLR)28 Oct 2025
- Wachira v Macharia & 4 others (Environment and Land Case E017 of 2025) (Environment and Land) [2025] KEELC 6235 (KLR)[2025] KEELC 6235 (KLR)25 Sept 2025
- Wachira v Macharia & 4 others (Environment and Land Case E017 of 2025) (Environment and Land) [2025] KEELC 6235 (KLR)[2025] KEELC 6235 (KLR)25 Sept 2025
- Kamau & 4 others (The Registered Trustees of New Testament Church of God Kenya) v Njuguna t/a Charismata Ministries Network & 2 others (Environment & Land Case E072 of 2024) [2025] KEELC 1333 (KLR)[2025] KEELC 1333 (KLR)19 Mar 2025
- Lokolinyang (Suing as the Legal Representative of the Late Lokolinyang Cheptipoch alias Lokoling’or Loyerik) & another v Rengono & 15 others (Environment & Land Case E029 of 2024) [2025] KEELC 19 (KLR)[2025] KEELC 19 (KLR)16 Jan 2025
- Ndungu & another v Mwaura (Environment & Land Case E025 of 2024) [2024] KEELC 7216 (KLR)[2024] KEELC 7216 (KLR)31 Oct 2024followed
- Abdallah v Realty Brokers Limited & another (Environment & Land Case E048 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 7046 (KLR)[2024] KEELC 7046 (KLR)24 Oct 2024applied
- Kamau (Administrator & Legal Representative of the Estate of Nduro Makau aka Nduku Makau - Deceased) v Parmar & another (As Administrators to the Estate of Nagindas Ramji - Deceased) (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons 468 of 2014) [2024] KEELC 5285 (KLR)[2024] KEELC 5285 (KLR)11 Jul 2024
- Mwakivonje (On his Behalf and on Behalf of the Estate of Kassim Ali Nzimu, Salim Mwatenga, Jumaa Vwinyu and Mwamoyo Moyo – Deceased) v Mwakaonje (Environment & Land Case E013 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 3794 (KLR)[2024] KEELC 3794 (KLR)26 Apr 2024applied
- Nouvetti Realtor Limited v Onduso (Suing On Her Own Behalf And On Behalf Of The Estate Of The Late George Kisanda Onchiri) (Environment and Land Appeal 3 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 3504 (KLR)[2024] KEELC 3504 (KLR)8 Apr 2024
- Shokat Ebrahim Ali Omar (Suing on his behalf and as legal representative of the Estates of Sakinabal Ali Mohamed (Deceased) v Intergra Auctioneers (K) Company & 3 others[2023] KEELC 21060 (KLR)9 Oct 2023
- Said v Issack & 3 others[2023] KEELC 19217 (KLR)27 Jul 2023
- Mwasarai v Omar & another[2023] KEELC 16778 (KLR)12 Apr 2023followed
- Omar (Suing on his behalf and as legal representative of the Estate of Sakinabal Ali Mohamed (Deceased) v Intergra Auctioneers (K) Company & 3 others (Environment & Land Case 231 of 2021) [2022] KEELC 2841 (KLR)[2022] KEELC 2841 (KLR)18 Jul 2022
- Omar (Suing on his behalf and as legal representative of the Estate of Sakinabal Ali Mohamed (Deceased) v Intergra Auctioneers (K) Company & 3 others (Environment & Land Case 231 of 2021) [2022] KEELC 2841 (KLR)[2022] KEELC 2841 (KLR)18 Jul 2022
Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Elijah Nderitu Gachaga v Francis Gakuu Gachaga & 2 others [2019] KEELC 773 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2019/773/eng@2019-11-14
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.