Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedJudicial Review No. 2 of 2018· [2019] KEELC 655 (KLR)

Republic v E. Muiru Senior Resident Magistrate Kilungu & 2 others; Robert Kilonzo Mwania & 2 others(Interested Parties) Ex-Parte Makueni Sand Conservation and Utilization Authority & another [2019] KEELC 655 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
6 November 2019
4,547 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~18 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's High Court confirmed that county governments and their agencies can be sued and restrained in ordinary courts like any other party.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Ex-parte Applicants, the Makueni Sand Conservation and Utilization Authority and the County Government of Makueni, sought judicial review orders of certiorari to quash three civil suits at Kilungu (Nos. 180, 205 and 147 of 2017) and prohibition against the Senior Resident Magistrates, contending that the injunctions granted against them violated Section 16 of the Government Proceedings Act (Cap 40) and Articles 1, 10, 159, 176, 185 and 189 of the Constitution. The Respondents and the Interested Parties opposed, arguing inter alia that the Government Proceedings Act does not apply to County Governments, that the application threatened judicial independence, and that Article 189 dispute-resolution procedures had not been exhausted. Mbogo J framed the determinative issues as entitlement to the orders sought and whether an injunction can issue against the Ex-parte Applicants. The court held that the Government Proceedings Act applies only to the National Government; County Governments and their bodies corporate are not protected by Sections 13A and 16, and the magistrates therefore had jurisdiction to grant the injunctions. The proper remedies for the Applicants were to apply to set aside the orders or to appeal. Following the Obaga J and Onguto J decisions in the Thungu and Ambuga cases, the court dismissed the application with costs to the Respondents and the 1st to 2nd Interested Parties on 6th November 2019.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Government Proceedings Act (Cap 40), particularly Sections 13A and 16, applies to County Governments and county-created bodies

Holding

It does not; County Governments are distinct bodies corporate with power to sue and be sued, and the Act has not been amended to extend to them, so injunctions could lawfully issue against the Ex-parte Applicants.

Reasoning

The court agreed with Obaga J and Onguto J in the Thungu and Ambuga cases that the Government Proceedings Act protects only the National Government. County Governments are body corporates under Section 6 of the County Governments Act, 2012, and had the legislature intended to extend the Act to them it would have expressly done so. Consequently the 1st Ex-parte Applicant, a body corporate created under the Makueni Sand Conservation and Utilization Act, 2015, enjoys no protection under Sections 13A or 16 of the Act.

p. 7
02

Whether judicial review orders of certiorari and prohibition should issue against the magistrates' injunction orders

Holding

No; the application failed because the magistrates had jurisdiction and the proper avenue was to set aside or appeal the orders, not to invoke judicial review.

Reasoning

The court held that once injunctions were issued against the Ex-parte Applicants, the remedies open to them were an application to set aside or an appeal. Granting certiorari and prohibition on these facts would amount to allowing the Applicants to usurp and subvert judicial authority, contrary to Articles 159 and 160 of the Constitution which insulate judicial officers exercising judicial authority derived from the people.

p. 7

Legal principles established

#
  • The Government Proceedings Act (Cap 40) applies only to the National Government and does not extend to County Governments or their entities unless expressly amended to include them.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Dismissal of the Ex-parte Applicants' Notice of Motion dated 19th March 2018 with costs to the Respondents and the 1st to 2nd Interested Parties

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010Order 53(3)
  • Law Reform ActSections 8 & 9
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Articles 1, 6(2), 10, 23, 47, 159(1), 159(2)(e), 160(1), 160(5), 176, 183, 185(2), 186, 189(3) & (4), Fourth Schedule Part 2
  • Government Proceedings ActCap 40, Sections 13A, 16
  • Intergovernmental Relations ActNo. 2 of 2012, Sections 31, 33, 34
  • Makueni Sand Conservation and Utilization Act2015, Sections 4(1), 6(1)
  • County Government Act2012, Sections 6(1), 6(2)(c)
  • Judicial Service ActSection 45

Cases cited (8)

  • Josephat Gathee Kibuchi vs. Kirinyaga County Council
    [2015] eKLR
  • Republic vs. Attorney General & Another exparte Stephen Wanyee Roki
    [2016] eKLR
  • Council of County Governors vs. Lake Basin Development Authorities & 6 others
    [2017] eKLR
  • County Government of Migori & 4 others vs. Privatization Commission of Kenya & Another
    [2017] eKLR
  • Republic vs. Principal Secretary, Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban Development & 4 others exparte Kenyatta Peter & 3 others
    [2018] eKLR
  • Charles Lutta Kasamani vs. Concord Insurance Co. Ltd & Deputy Registrar Milimani High Court Commercial and Admiralty Division
    [2018] eKLR
  • James Muigai Thungu vs. County Government of Trans Nzoia & 2 Others
    [2015] eKLR
  • George Albert Ambuga vs. Kajiado County Government & Another
    [2015] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Order 53(3) of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010 and Sections 8 & 9 of the Law Reform Act (judicial review of subordinate court decisions)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Republic v E. Muiru Senior Resident Magistrate Kilungu & 2 others; Robert Kilonzo Mwania & 2 others(Interested Parties) Ex-Parte Makueni Sand Conservation and Utilization Authority & another [2019] KEELC 655 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). Judicial Review No. 2 of 2018. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2019/655/eng@2019-11-06

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.