Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedELC Case (Nyandarua), Plaint dated 24th July 2018; Notice of Preliminary Objection dated 5th March 2019· [2019] KEELC 567 (KLR)

Nyokabi Kinyanjui & another v John Njenga Kinyanjui [2019] KEELC 567 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
26 November 2019
2,132 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~9 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court confirmed you can claim family land in trust through the Environment and Land Court, even if the land passed through a succession case.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Plaintiffs sued the Defendant, their sibling, seeking a declaration that he holds parcel Nyandarua/Mkungi/45 and its subdivisions Nyandarua/Mkungi/5022-5024 in trust for himself and them, plus cancellation of the subdivisions so the land reverts to the mother title for equal division. The Plaint alleged the Defendant had himself registered as sole proprietor of their deceased father's land through a succession cause and then sought to evict them. Before the hearing, the Defendant raised a preliminary objection dated 5th March 2019, arguing that the suit was purely a succession dispute and that the Environment and Land Court lacked jurisdiction, the proper forum being the probate court, relying on Re Estate of John Nthiwa Nzioka. The Plaintiffs countered that the suit did not challenge the succession process but asserted a customary trust over the land, that the certificate of succession issued in 1979 predated the Law of Succession Act (1981), and that jurisdiction should be gauged from the prayers sought. Framing two issues, the court adopted the Mukisa Biscuits definition of a preliminary objection and followed Julius Wachira Maina, holding that the ELC would lack jurisdiction only if the trust question had been raised and determined in the succession cause. Since it had not, the claim was a land dispute under Article 162(2)(b) and Section 13 of the ELC Act. The preliminary objection was dismissed with costs to the Plaintiffs, and the suit proceeds to full hearing.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Environment and Land Court can entertain a claim for a declaration of trust where the land was transmitted through a certificate of succession

Holding

Yes - the dispute is one relating to title to and interest in land within Article 162(2)(b) and Section 13 of the ELC Act, and does not amount to setting aside the succession orders where trust was not an issue in that cause.

Reasoning

The court distinguished between challenging the validity of succession proceedings and asserting a customary trust over land. Applying Julius Wachira Maina, it held that jurisdiction is ousted only if the trust question was raised and determined in the succession cause. Since the certificate of succession issued in 1979, before the Law of Succession Act came into operation in 1981, and trust was never considered there, the Plaintiffs' claim for a declaration of trust was properly before the ELC.

p. 3
02

Whether the Defendant's Preliminary Objection met the Mukisa Biscuits test

Holding

The objection, though a pure point of law on jurisdiction, failed on merit because the suit as pleaded sought a trust declaration, not a review of the succession cause.

Reasoning

The court adopted the Mukisa Biscuits definition of a preliminary objection as a point of law that may dispose of the suit. Jurisdiction is determined from the pleadings and prayers, and the ultimate objective of the litigant is deciphered from the prayers sought. Here the prayers sought a declaration of trust and cancellation of subdivisions, a land dispute within ELC jurisdiction, so the objection lacked merit.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An ELC suit claiming a declaration of trust over land succeeds to land is not a disguised challenge to a succession cause where the trust question was never determined in the succession proceedings; the ELC retains jurisdiction.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Defendant's Notice of Preliminary Objection dated 5th March 2019 is dismissed
  2. 2.Costs of the Preliminary Objection awarded to the Plaintiffs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 162(2)(b)
  • Environment and Land Court ActSection 13(2) / Section 13
  • Law of Succession ActSections 47 and 70
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 11
  • Registration of Land Act (repealed)null
  • Practice Directions on Proceedings in the Environment and Land Courts (Gazette Notice 5178 of 2014)Practice Direction No. 6

Cases cited (5)

  • Mukisa Biscuits Manufacturing Co. Ltd -v- West End Distributors Limited
    (1969) EA. 696
  • Re Estate of John Nthiwa Nzioka (deceased)
    [2018] eKLR
  • James Aggrey Nyapola Michael & Another vs Rosemary Irene Wanga
    [2014] eKLR
  • Henry Njung'e Kirika & Another v Kezia Njango Kirika (Being The Administrator Of The Estate Of Stephen Kirika Njunge (Deceased)
    [2014] eKLR
  • Julius Wachira Maina & 2 others v Christopher Murathe Muraguri
    [2017] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution and Section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Nyokabi Kinyanjui & another v John Njenga Kinyanjui [2019] KEELC 567 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). ELC Case (Nyandarua), Plaint dated 24th July 2018; Notice of Preliminary Objection dated 5th March 2019. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2019/567/eng@2019-11-26

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.