Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedNotice of Motion dated 10th October 2016 (in ELC appeal, Kerugoya)· [2019] KEELC 179 (KLR)

Njomo Njeru & 2 others v Priscilla Wanjira; James Ndwiga Njogu (Interested Party) [2019] KEELC 179 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
22 November 2019
1,368 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan land buyer who bought property at auction was allowed to join an appeal and block any sale or transfer of the land until the appeal ends.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was a ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Kerugoya (E.C. Cherono, ELC Judge) on a Notice of Motion dated 10th October 2016 brought by James Ndwiga Njogu, the interested party/applicant, under Order 1 Rules 10 & 14 CPR, Sections 1A, 1B and 100 CPA and Articles 40 and 159 of the Constitution. The applicant sought enjoinment as an interested party, temporary and mandatory injunctions restraining the respondents from alienating, selling or dealing with land parcel KABARE/NGIROCHE/1076, and a restriction/caveat on the title. He deponed that he bought the property at a public auction on 2nd June 2009, obtained a certificate of sale and a court order in PMCC No. 73 of 2009, and was the registered owner in possession. The respondent Priscilla Wanjira filed grounds of opposition; no other responses were filed. The court applied the Muruatetu criteria for enjoinment, found the applicant's interest identifiable, proximate and uncontroverted, and held he would suffer irreparable loss if not enjoined. The court allowed the application: the applicant was enjoined as interested party; an injunction issued restraining alienation or dealing with the suit property pending the hearing and determination of the intended appeal; the District Land Registrar, Kirinyaga was directed to place a caveat/restriction on the land; and costs were ordered to abide the event. A mandatory injunction was not granted in the terms sought, only a prohibitory injunction.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the applicant qualified to be enjoined as an interested party

Holding

The court found the applicant demonstrated a high stake as registered proprietor of the suit property and would suffer irreparable loss if not enjoined

Reasoning

The court applied the Muruatetu criteria for enjoinment. The applicant's uncontroverted affidavit evidence showed he purchased the suit property at a public auction, obtained a certificate of sale and court order leading to registration in his name. Being the registered proprietor in actual possession, his interest was identifiable, proximate and prejudiced by the pending appeal. The application was therefore merited.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An interested party is a person with an identifiable stake or legal interest in the proceedings
  • Enjoinment as an interested party requires a clearly identifiable and proximate interest, demonstrated prejudice from non-joinder, and distinct submissions

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The applicant, James Ndwiga Njogu, is enjoined as an interested party
  2. 2.An injunction issued against the respondents, their agents or anybody acting on their behalf, from alienating, disposing off, selling, trespassing on or in any other way dealing with land parcel No. KABARE/NGIROCHE/1076 pending the hearing and determination of the intended Appeal
  3. 3.The District Land Registrar, Kirinyaga is directed to place a caveat/restriction against land No. KABARE/NGIROCHE/1076 pending the hearing and final determination of the intended Appeal
  4. 4.Costs of the application to abide the event

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 1 Rule 10 & 14
  • Civil Procedure ActSections 1A, 1B & 100
  • Constitution of Kenya 2010Articles 10, 40, 159 & 258

Cases cited (3)

  • Judicial Service Commission Vs Speaker of the National Assembly & Another
  • Mumo Matemu Vs Trusted Society of Human Rights Alliance and 5 others
  • Francis Karoki Muruatetu & Another Vs Republic & 5 others
    Petition No. 15 as consolidated with 16 of 2013 (2016) eKLR
On appeal from
Senior Resident Magistrate's Court
SRM CC No. 135 of 2013
Jurisdiction invoked
Order 1 Rules 10 & 14 CPR; Sections 1A, 1B & 100 CPA; Articles 40 & 159 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Njomo Njeru & 2 others v Priscilla Wanjira; James Ndwiga Njogu (Interested Party) [2019] KEELC 179 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). Notice of Motion dated 10th October 2016 (in ELC appeal, Kerugoya). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2019/179/eng@2019-11-22

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.