Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedNotice of Motion dated 8th May 2018 (suit filed at Thika)· [2019] KEELC 38 (KLR)

Micheal Kagume Gatura v Equity Bank (K) Ltd & another [2019] KEELC 38 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
4 July 2019
2,121 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~8 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan bank couldn't prove it mailed required notices before auctioning a borrower's property, so the court stopped the sale.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Plaintiff/Applicant, a former employee of the 1st Defendant bank, brought a Notice of Motion dated 8 May 2018 seeking a temporary injunction restraining the Defendants from selling by public auction or otherwise interfering with three suit properties offered as security for a Kshs 6,000,000 mortgage and a Kshs 1,200,000 plot development loan. He alleged he was never served with statutory notices, a redemption notice or a proclamation, and that the bank unilaterally increased his monthly instalments after his dismissal. The Defendants opposed, asserting that demand, notice to sell and redemption notices were duly issued and served, and annexed a Postal Corporation list of registered packets and an auctioneer's certificate of postage. Justice L. Gacheru, delivering the ruling at Thika on 4 July 2019, applied the Giella tripartite test. On prima facie case, the Court held that while land given as security becomes a commodity for sale and courts cannot rewrite contracts, the chargee must strictly comply with mandatory statutory notice requirements. The bank's failure to produce a receipt evidencing that the notices were paid for and posted meant the Court could not find service, so the Plaintiff established a prima facie case with probability of success, and the omissions infringed his rights and clogged his right of redemption. On irreparable harm, damages cannot compensate infringement of rights, especially where his home stands on the property. The balance of convenience favoured maintaining the status quo restraining sale. The application was allowed entirely with costs to the Plaintiff, and an injunction issued restraining sale or interference with the suit properties pending hearing and determination of the suit.

Key legal issues

#
01

Service of statutory notices before exercise of chargee's power of sale

Holding

The chargee failed to prove that the statutory notices were paid for and posted; non-compliance with mandatory notice requirements clogged the chargor's right of redemption and established a prima facie case

Reasoning

The 1st Defendant annexed only a Postal Corporation list of registered packets and a certificate of postage by the auctioneer dated 15 March 2018, without a receipt evidencing payment and posting of the notices to the Plaintiff. Relying on Nyagilo Ochieng, posting of statutory notice must be proved unless receipt is admitted. Failure to prove service meant the power of sale had not validly crystallised.

p. 2
02

Irreparable harm and adequacy of damages

Holding

Damages cannot compensate the infringement of the chargor's rights occasioned by failure to follow the mandatory statutory steps; the home standing on the suit property weighs in favour of an injunction

Reasoning

Although land offered as security is a commodity for sale, the chargee did not carry out all the requisite steps before exercising its statutory power of sale. Damages is not an automatic remedy and cannot substitute a crystallised right protectable by injunction; payment of damages cannot compensate infringement of rights.

p. 3
03

Balance of convenience

Holding

The balance of convenience tilts toward preserving the status quo, being non-sale of the suit properties by public auction until the suit is determined

Reasoning

The Court found the balance of convenience, even if in doubt, favours maintaining the status quo that existed before the wrongful act, namely restraint of the scheduled public auction pending the hearing of the suit.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Once land is given as security for a loan it becomes a commodity for sale
  • A court cannot rewrite a contract between parties unless coercion, fraud or undue influence are pleaded and proved
  • Posting of statutory notice must be proved unless receipt is admitted; a mere list of postal packets without a receipt does not prove service

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Temporary injunction restraining the Defendants, their agents and servants from selling by public auction or private treaty or otherwise interfering with the Plaintiff's ownership, possession and interest in LR Kiambu/Municipality Block 5 (Kiamumbi) 3126, Ruiru/Kiu Block 2/7688 and Ruiru/Kiu 7689 pending hearing and determination of the suit
  2. 2.Costs of the application to the Plaintiff/Applicant

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Land Actstatutory power of sale
  • Evidence Act (Cap 80)section 59
  • Interpretation and General Provisions Act (Cap 2)section 3(5)

Cases cited (7)

  • Paul Muhoro Kihara vs Barclays Bank (K) Ltd
    Milimani HCCC No. 33 of 2002 (2001) 2EA 420
  • Emo Investment Ltd Vs Stephanus Petrus Kiinge
    (2010) eKLR
  • National Oil vs Pipeplastic Samkolit (K) Ltd & Prof Samson K. Ongeri
    (C.A No. 95 of 1999)
  • Karige Kihoro versus Equity Bank Limited & Another
    (2016) eKLR
  • Nyagilo Ochieng & Another Vs. Fanuel Ochieng & 2 Others
    Civil Appeal No. 148 of 1995 [1995-1998] 2 EA 260
  • Joseph Siro Mosioma Vs HFCK & 3 Others
    eKLR
  • Agnes Adhiambo Ojwang Vs Wycliffe Odhiambo Ojijo
    Kisumu HCCC No. 205 of 2000
Jurisdiction invoked
Inherent jurisdiction to grant interlocutory relief pending hearing of the suit (Land Act statutory power of sale dispute)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Micheal Kagume Gatura v Equity Bank (K) Ltd & another [2019] KEELC 38 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). Notice of Motion dated 8th May 2018 (suit filed at Thika). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2019/38/eng@2019-07-04

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.