Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedELC Case (Murang'a) – suit filed 17/6/2016 (number not stated in judgment)· [2018] KEELC 4441 (KLR)

M M G v J G & another [2018] KEELC 4441 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
23 February 2018
2,607 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~10 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Environment and Land Court confirmed that adult children have no right to force parents to share land while the parents are still alive.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Plaintiff, a former foster mother, sued two Defendants she had taken into custody as minors under a 1999 guardianship order. She raised and educated them; the guardianship was discharged on 7/1/2011. She sought restraining orders, eviction from land parcel LOC 19/Gacharageini/****, and costs, alleging that the Defendants refused to vacate, colluded with the local chief to partition her land into three portions, and that the 1st Defendant converted her house into an educational institution without consent. The Defendants filed a joint defence asserting they were adopted under section 183 of the Adoption Act, alleging mistreatment during childhood, and claiming an agreement reached at the chief's office to partition 3.7 Ha into three shares (1.0 Ha each to them and 1.54 Ha to the Plaintiff). They relied on the Children's Act. At the hearing on 9/10/17 only the Plaintiff testified; the Defendants, though granted time, filed no submissions. The court first confirmed jurisdiction under Article 162(1)(b) and section 13 of the ELC Act. It then held that the Defendants, now adults in gainful employment, have no rights under the Children's Act, and that no Kenyan law obligates parents to distribute land to children during their lifetime, applying the Court of Appeal decisions in Nahashon Kerenge and Marigi. Under the Land Registration Act, the registered proprietor's title is protected subject only to trusts and overriding interests, none pleaded or proved. Although the Plaintiff produced no title document, the Defendants' admission of her ownership sufficed. The suit succeeded: the Defendants were ordered to vacate within 60 days and were permanently restrained, with eviction on default, and they were ordered to pay the costs of the suit.

Key legal issues

#
01

Jurisdiction of the ELC over a dispute between a former foster mother and her former foster children

Holding

The Court has jurisdiction, as the dispute relates to ownership rights and interests in land.

Reasoning

The Court derived its jurisdiction from Article 162(1)(b) of the Constitution and section 13(1) and (2) of the ELC Act, which confer mandate over disputes relating to title, tenure, private land and any other dispute relating to environment and land. Since the case revolves on ownership rights between a former foster mother and her now-adult benefactors, it falls squarely within the Court's precincts.

p. 4
02

Whether adult adopted/foster children are entitled to the foster parent's land during her lifetime

Holding

No. There is no law obligating parents to distribute land to children during their lifetime, and children's inheritance rights are inchoate until death.

Reasoning

Relying on the Court of Appeal decisions in Nahashon Kerenge and Marigi, the court held there is no vested right to inheritance during a parent's lifetime. The Defendants, being adults in gainful employment, do not qualify for rights under the Children's Act, and their guardianship order had lawfully been revoked. Section 26 of the Land Registration Act does not list rights by children as a ground for challenging a proprietor's title.

p. 4
03

Whether the Plaintiff proved ownership of the suit land

Holding

Ownership was proved by the Defendants' admission in their joint defence, notwithstanding the absence of a title document from the Plaintiff.

Reasoning

Although the Plaintiff did not produce a certified copy of title, official search or green card, the Defendants admitted in their joint defence and witness statements that she is the registered owner. That fact being uncontested, ownership was established, and section 24(a) of the Land Registration Act vests absolute ownership in the registered proprietor.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • There is no vested right to inheritance during the lifetime of parents; a child cannot force parents to sub-divide and distribute their land during their lifetime.
  • Rights of children over a parent's estate are inchoate and accrue upon the parent's death.
  • Registration as proprietor vests absolute ownership, subject only to trusts and overriding interests, which must be pleaded and proved.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Defendants to voluntarily vacate LOC 19/Gacharageini/**** within 60 days from the date of judgment and be permanently restrained from being on the suit land
  2. 2.In default, the Plaintiff at liberty to initiate eviction of the Defendants as laid down in the law
  3. 3.The Defendants to bear the costs of the suit

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 162(1)(b)
  • Environment and Land Court ActSection 13(1) & (2)
  • Children's Actnot specified (revocation of orders; rights of children)
  • Adoption ActSection 183
  • Land Registration ActSections 24(a), 25, 26 and 28

Cases cited (3)

  • Edward Kipkosgei Chemurbii & Ano vs Charles K Kosgei & Ano
    ELC No. 338 of 2013 (Eldoret)
  • Nahashon Karenge & Justus Thiru Zakayo vs Lawrence Karenge
    Civil Appeal No. 222 of 2010, Nyeri
  • Marigi vs. Muriuki & 2 Others
    Civil Case No. 189 of 1996 (2008) 1 KLR 1073
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(1)(b) of the Constitution and sections 13(1) & (2) of the Environment and Land Court Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "M M G v J G & another [2018] KEELC 4441 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2018). ELC Case (Murang'a) – suit filed 17/6/2016 (number not stated in judgment). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2018/4441/eng@2018-02-23

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.