Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNot stated in the judgment (Notice of Motion dated 12th October, 2017)· [2018] KEELC 4000 (KLR)

Keekonyokie Community Trust v Moses Parantai & 2 others [2018] KEELC 4000 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
5 February 2018
1,769 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kajiado court dismissed a contempt case filed too late, confirming Kenya's six-month deadline for punishing court-order defiance.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Plaintiff filed a Notice of Motion dated 12th October, 2017 seeking committal of the 1st and 2nd Defendants to civil jail for up to six months for disobeying an order of Lady Justice Gacheru requiring them to deposit the title deed to LR NO. NGONG/NGONG/12418 in court and preserve the status quo pending the hearing of the main suit. The Respondents opposed the application through a preliminary objection that the application was time barred under Section 34 of the Contempt of Court Act, and grounds of opposition denying service of the order and penal notice. The court framed two issues: whether the application was time barred, and whether the Respondents were in contempt. Relying on Shimmers Plaza Ltd v NBK and North Tetu Farmers Co Ltd, the court outlined the elements of civil contempt and found that the Respondents were present in court when the order was made, so service and a penal notice were unnecessary, and that they had not deposited the title deed nor obtained a stay pending appeal. However, the application had been filed more than six months after the order and after the contempt was last mentioned before Justice Obaga, so Section 34 barred the proceedings. The court upheld the first ground of the preliminary objection, declined the committal orders, but in the interest of justice directed the Defendants to deposit the title deed within 21 days, failing which they could be cited for contempt. Costs were ordered to be in the cause.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the contempt application was time barred under Section 34 of the Contempt of Court Act

Holding

Yes - the application was filed more than six months after the order of October 2016 and after the contempt was last mentioned before Justice Obaga, so it was barred

Reasoning

The court found the order directing deposit of the title deed was granted in October 2016 and the parties were present in court when it was made. The contempt application was not brought within the six-month window prescribed by Section 34, and the court concurred with the first ground of the preliminary objection.

p. 3
02

Whether the 1st and 2nd Respondents were in contempt of the order of 14th October, 2016

Holding

The court found the elements of knowledge and non-compliance made out but declined to punish for contempt because of the statutory time bar

Reasoning

The Respondents were present when the order was granted, so service and penal notice did not arise; they had not deposited the title deed and no stay pending appeal had been granted. However, the six-month limitation under Section 34 precluded the committal orders sought.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Contempt proceedings must be initiated within six months of the alleged contempt under Section 34 of the Contempt of Court Act
  • Service of an order is satisfied where a party was present in court when the order was made or was represented by counsel

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application dated 12th October, 2017 is declined/disallowed
  2. 2.The 1st and 2nd Defendants to deposit in Court the title deed to the suit land (LR NO. NGONG/NGONG/12418) within 21 days from the date of the ruling, failure of which they can be cited for contempt
  3. 3.Costs in the cause
Jurisdiction invoked
Sections 1A, 1B and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act, Order 51 of the Civil Procedure Rules and Sections 4(1)(a), 5(b), 27(b) and 28 of the Contempt of Court Act 2016

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Keekonyokie Community Trust v Moses Parantai & 2 others [2018] KEELC 4000 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2018). Not stated in the judgment (Notice of Motion dated 12th October, 2017). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2018/4000/eng@2018-02-05

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.