Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNot stated in judgment· [2018] KEELC 3606 (KLR)

Dismas Namiti v Basale Farmers Cooperative Society & another [2018] KEELC 3606 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
20 April 2018
1,461 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court confirmed it—not the Co-operative Tribunal—decides disputes over land titles and fraud, even after a Tribunal ruling.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling by the Environment and Land Court at Kitale (Mwangi Njoroge, J) determined a Preliminary Objection dated 22/1/2017 raised by the two defendants in a suit filed by the plaintiff, a former member of the 1st defendant co-operative society. The plaintiff alleged he was allocated Plot No. 17 in 1975, remained in exclusive possession, and that after the Co-operative Tribunal permanently injuncted the society from interfering with the plot in a 2005 dispute, the society and the 2nd defendant fraudulently obtained titles to his 4.1 acres and 1.1 acres respectively by omitting his name from the area list submitted for titling. He sought a declaration that the registrations were fraudulent and an order for cancellation of the titles. The defendants objected that the suit was res judicata under Section 7 of the Civil Procedure Act and offended Section 76 of the Co-operative Societies Act, which vests jurisdiction in the Co-operative Tribunal. The court held the issues in the suit - fraud in obtaining titles, omission from the area list, and cancellation of titles - were totally different from the expulsion and eviction issues determined by the Tribunal, no titles having been issued at that time, so res judicata did not apply. On jurisdiction, the court held that the dispute concerns real property and title, matters within Section 13(2) of the Environment and Land Court Act under Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution, and that the ELC's jurisdiction supersedes that of the Tribunal, whose powers may not extend to cancellation of title. The Preliminary Objection was dismissed wholly with costs to the plaintiff.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the suit is res judicata under Section 7 of the Civil Procedure Act given the prior Nairobi Co-operative Tribunal Case No. 7 of 2005

Holding

The first limb of the Preliminary Objection fails because the issues in the present suit are totally different from those before the Tribunal; the Tribunal determined expulsion and eviction, whereas this suit concerns fraud in obtaining titles issued after the Tribunal's decision.

Reasoning

The court compared the issues before the Tribunal (whether the plaintiff had been expelled and deserved eviction) with the issues in the plaint (fraudulent registration, omission of the plaintiff's name from the area list, cancellation of titles and rectification of the register). No titles had been issued when the Tribunal decided, so the fraud claim could not have been litigated then. The Tribunal judgment merely forms a background against which the fraud claim is assessed.

p. 2
02

Whether jurisdiction lies with the Co-operative Tribunal under Section 76 of the Co-operative Societies Act rather than the ELC

Holding

This court, established under Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution and empowered by Section 13(2) of the Environment and Land Court Act, is the appropriate forum for a dispute concerning title to land and fraud in acquisition of title; the ELC's jurisdiction supersedes that of the Co-operative Tribunal in such matters.

Reasoning

The court held that the plaintiff's grievance is not about mere membership of the society but about a parcel of land he occupies, from which he is threatened with eviction, and regarding which fraud is alleged in the manner the defendants acquired title. The dispute therefore relates to real property within Section 13(2) of the ELC Act. The Tribunal's powers may not extend to cancellation of title.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • The ELC has jurisdiction over disputes relating to title to land even where a Co-operative Tribunal previously determined a membership/eviction dispute, since the plaintiff's grievance concerns a parcel of land and fraud in acquisition of title, not mere membership.
  • Res judicata does not bar a subsequent suit where the issues now raised (fraud in obtaining titles) are different from those determined in the former suit and did not exist at the time of the earlier adjudication.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Preliminary Objection dated 22/1/2017 dismissed wholly with costs to the plaintiff

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure Act Cap 21Section 7
  • Co-operative Societies Act Cap 490Section 76
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 162(2)(b)
  • Environment and Land Court Act No. 19 of 2011Section 13(2)

Cases cited (7)

  • E.T. -vs- Attorney General and Another
    [2012] eKLR
  • Omondi -vs- National Bank of Kenya Ltd and Others
    [2001] EA 177
  • James Katabazi & 21 Others -vs- The Attorney General of the Republic of Uganda
  • Henderson -vs- Henderson
    [1843-60] ALL.E.R. 378
  • Luis Muthini Kitonyi -vs- Konza Ranching & Co-operative Society Ltd
    Machakos ELC No. 7 of 2003
  • Kennedy Kimani Ndarwa -vs- Methi & Swani Farmers Co-operative Society Ltd & Another
    Nyeri ELC No. 545 of 2014
  • Mohamed Said -vs- County Council of Nandi & Another
    Eldoret ELC Petition No. 2 of 2013
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution; Section 13(2) of the Environment and Land Court Act No. 19 of 2011

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Dismas Namiti v Basale Farmers Cooperative Society & another [2018] KEELC 3606 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2018). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2018/3606/eng@2018-04-20

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.