Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedELC Case No. 458 of 2017 (Formerly Machakos ELC Case No. 3 of 2015)· [2018] KEELC 3464 (KLR)

Hodhan Dahir Mahamud & another (Suing as the Administrators of the Estate of Mohamood Mohamed Hussein) v Attorney General (Sued for and on behalf of the Land Registrar – Kajiado) & another [2018] KEELC 3464 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
19 April 2018
2,111 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~8 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court cancelled a fraudulent title over Kajiado land, restoring it to a deceased owner's estate—but denied damages because none were proven.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Plaintiffs, administrators of the estate of Mohamood Mohamed Hussein (deceased) pursuant to Nairobi HC Succession Cause No. 721 of 2007, sued the Attorney General (for the Land Registrar, Kajiado) and Joseph Gitau Kungu seeking declarations that the deceased was the absolute proprietor of land parcel KAJIADO/KAPUTIEI-NORTH/1610, that the 1st Defendant acted unlawfully in issuing a title to the 2nd Defendant, restoration of the title to the deceased's name, a permanent injunction, general damages and costs. The Defendants never entered appearance or filed a defence despite service; interlocutory judgment was entered and the suit proceeded to formal proof on 23rd November 2017, with the two Plaintiffs testifying as PW1 and PW2. Their uncontroverted evidence established that the deceased bought the land in 1991 from Gadiel Lama Ole Nkarro, that the Plaintiffs held the original title deed, and that a search revealed a transfer to the 2nd Defendant backdated to 25th October 1994 while the deceased was alive. Framing six issues, the court applied Section 26 of the Land Registration Act, which permits challenge to a title acquired illegally, unprocedurally or through a corrupt scheme, and followed the Kisii High Court decision in Amos Onyango Odongo v Maurice Were Ojowi on the rule of law. The court found the 2nd Defendant's acquisition fraudulent, noting he lodged no objection in the succession cause. Judgment was entered for the Plaintiffs: the deceased was declared registered proprietor, the Registrar was directed to cancel the 2nd Defendant's title and reinstate registration in the deceased's name, and the Defendants were permanently restrained from dealing with the land. General damages were declined for want of proof. Costs were awarded to the Plaintiffs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the deceased was the registered proprietor of the suit land

Holding

The Plaintiffs' title deed was prima facie evidence that the deceased was the absolute proprietor of the suit land

Reasoning

The Plaintiffs produced the original title deed in the name of the deceased, registered on 18th January 1991, together with conveyance documents showing transfer from Gadiel Lama Ole Nkarro to the deceased. The Defendants never entered appearance and the evidence went uncontroverted at formal proof. The court held the title deed to be prima facie evidence of the deceased's absolute proprietorship.

p. 3
02

Whether the 2nd Defendant illegally and fraudulently acquired the suit land

Holding

The court found the 2nd Defendant acquired the title fraudulently and that the suit land belongs to the deceased estate

Reasoning

The Plaintiffs retained custody of the original title deed, yet a search showed a transfer to the 2nd Defendant backdated to 25th October 1994 while the deceased was alive. Under Section 26 of the Land Registration Act a title may be challenged where acquired illegally, unprocedurally or through a corrupt scheme. The 2nd Defendant tendered no evidence of purchase and lodged no objection in the succession cause. The uncontroverted evidence established fraud.

p. 3
03

Whether the Plaintiffs are entitled to general damages

Holding

General damages were declined for lack of proof

Reasoning

Although the Plaintiffs pleaded general damages, no evidence was led to prove the damages suffered. The court distinguished between liability, which was proved on a balance of probability, and quantum of damages, which requires evidentiary support. As no evidence of loss was canvassed, the head of damages was refused even though the substantive claim succeeded.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • A certificate of title is prima facie evidence of absolute and indefeasible ownership, but may be challenged on grounds of fraud or misrepresentation, or where acquired illegally, unprocedurally or through a corrupt scheme (Section 26, Land Registration Act)
  • Courts cannot condone illegality in dealings with a deceased person's estate; such dealings are void and a nullity

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The deceased Mohamood Mohamed Hussein be and is hereby declared as the registered proprietor of land parcel number KAJIADO/KAPUTIEI-NORTH/1610
  2. 2.The 1st Defendant through the Land Registrar Kajiado be and is hereby directed to forthwith cancel the title deed of land parcel number KAJIADO/KAPUTIEI-NORTH/1610 held by the 2nd Defendant and register the same in the name of Mohamood Mohamed Hussein
  3. 3.The Defendants, by themselves, servants and/or agents be and is hereby permanently restrained from entering upon, selling or otherwise disposing or in any other way dealing in the land parcel number KAJIADO/KAPUTIEI NORTH/1610 without the express written consent or authority of the Plaintiffs
  4. 4.Costs of the suit are awarded to the Plaintiffs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Land Registration ActSection 26(1)

Cases cited (1)

  • AMOS ONYANGO ODONGO Vs. MAURICE WERE OJOWI AND 3 OTHERS
    (2016) eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Environment and Land Court established under Article 162(2) of the Constitution (land disputes concerning title to land)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Hodhan Dahir Mahamud & another (Suing as the Administrators of the Estate of Mohamood Mohamed Hussein) v Attorney General (Sued for and on behalf of the Land Registrar – Kajiado) & another [2018] KEELC 3464 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2018). ELC Case No. 458 of 2017 (Formerly Machakos ELC Case No. 3 of 2015). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2018/3464/eng@2018-04-19

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.