Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedKisii ELC Case (as pleaded; suit concerning Majoge/Boochi/138)· [2018] KEELC 3376 (KLR)

Samson Menda Juma v Registered Trustees Getuki Catholic Church Centre – Sengera Parish & 2 others [2018] KEELC 3376 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
11 May 2018
2,500 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~10 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The court dismissed a land claim because inheritance disputes over a deceased person's property must first be resolved in a succession cause, not a land court.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The plaintiff, administrator of the estate of Chuma Moncha (deceased) under an unconfirmed grant issued on 14 March 2005 in Kisii HC Succ. Cause No. 250 of 2002, sued the 1st and 2nd defendants and the Land Registrar, seeking declarations that the subdivision and transfer of Majoge/Boochi/138 into parcels 4780 and 4781 was null and void, cancellation of the defendants' titles and a permanent injunction. He alleged fraud and claimed he had signed transfer documents in 2007 while serving a prison term without capacity, the succession cause being pending. The 1st and 2nd defendants denied fraud, asserting they received parcel 3959 without knowledge it derived from parcel 138; the 3rd defendant did not appear. The court suo moto retrieved the succession file and found the grant was never confirmed, the file had been closed in 2009 and a revocation application by the plaintiff's brother was struck out in 2016. It framed four issues and held: the succession cause was never finalized; the suit was unsustainable because distribution of the deceased estate is the mandate of the succession court, not the ELC; and fraud was unproven, the plaintiff being a willing participant who lacked clean hands. The court dismissed the suit with costs to the 1st and 2nd defendants, leaving the pending succession cause to resolve the estate's distribution.

Key legal issues

#
01

Status of Kisii HC Succ. Cause No. 250 of 2002

Holding

The succession cause was never finalized; the grant was never confirmed and is contested by the plaintiff's brother

Reasoning

The court suo moto retrieved the succession file and found the grant issued on 14 March 2005 was never confirmed; the file was deemed closed by Muchelule, J on 15 May 2009 and an application for revocation of grant by the plaintiff's brother was struck out on 9 March 2016 because the closed file had not been reopened.

p. 3
02

Sustainability of the instant suit while succession proceedings are pending

Holding

The suit is unsustainable; distribution of the deceased estate is for the succession court, not the ELC

Reasoning

The only asset disclosed in the estate was parcel Majoge/Boochi/138. The green card showed registration of the plaintiff subject to a certificate of confirmation of grant, later removed, and the parcel was subdivided into 3951-3963. How beneficiaries of the subtitles were determined is a matter for the succession court, which this court lacks mandate to decide.

p. 3
03

Fraud against the 1st and 2nd defendants

Holding

Fraud was not proved; the plaintiff was a willing participant and did not discharge the higher burden

Reasoning

The plaintiff gave an untruthful account of a prison term to explain documents he executed; he never explained why the succession cause was not completed. The defendants' interest was only in parcel 3959, so they did not cause the subdivision of parcel 138. The burden of proving fraud lay on the plaintiff and was not discharged.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • It is the succession court that has the authority and jurisdiction to determine the beneficiaries of a deceased estate and the distribution of its assets
  • The burden of proving fraud is higher than a balance of probabilities though below the criminal standard, and rests on the party alleging it
  • A suit filed while a succession cause over the same estate remains pending and unfinalized is an abuse of the court process

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The plaintiff's suit is dismissed
  2. 2.Costs of the suit awarded to the 1st and 2nd defendants

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Probate and Administration RulesRule 73
Jurisdiction invoked
Original jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court over land disputes; the court found the succession court, not this Court, seized with authority over distribution of the deceased estate

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Samson Menda Juma v Registered Trustees Getuki Catholic Church Centre – Sengera Parish & 2 others [2018] KEELC 3376 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2018). Kisii ELC Case (as pleaded; suit concerning Majoge/Boochi/138). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2018/3376/eng@2018-05-11

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.