Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedELC Case No. 661 of 2017· [2018] KEELC 3328 (KLR)

Eliud Kimotho Chabi v Sankale Ole Lankas (Environment & Land Case 661 of 2017) [2018] KEELC 3328 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
4 April 2018
1,461 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The plaintiff sued by plaint dated 20th June 2014 seeking a declaration that he is the lawful owner of land parcel Kajiado/Olchoro Onyore/173, an order evicting the defendant, his servants or agents from that parcel, and costs. The defendant denied trespass, contending he owned parcel Kajiado/Olchoro Onyore/259, later subdivided into 1429 and 1430, and alleged a road separated the two parcels. At the hearing on 11th October 2017 only the plaintiff testified, adopting his witness statement and producing his title deed, the Land Disputes Tribunal proceedings, and the reports and summons of the District Surveyor and District Land Registrar Kajiado. The defendant's counsel ceased acting and did not participate in the hearing. The court framed four issues: proprietorship, encroachment, eviction and costs. It found the plaintiff registered proprietor of the suit land since 14th February 1985, his title being prima facie and indefeasible evidence of ownership under section 26(1) of the Land Registration Act, unrebutted by the defendant. The 2011 findings of the District Land Registrar and Surveyor - that illegal structures encroaching on the plaintiff's land should be removed - were unappealed and uncontroverted, and the presence of the defendant's structures was itself proof of encroachment. Applying section 24(a) of the Act and the Ahmed Ibrahim Suleiman authority, the court held the plaintiff entitled to protection of the law and quiet possession. Judgment was entered for the plaintiff on a balance of probability: a declaration of absolute proprietorship, an eviction order against the defendant and his servants or agents, and costs of the suit to the plaintiff.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Plaintiff is the legal proprietor of the suit land

Holding

Yes; the Plaintiff is the legal proprietor as the title deed produced is prima facie evidence of ownership and the Defendant did not rebut it

Reasoning

PW1 produced his title deed as exhibit '1' showing he had been the registered proprietor of Kajiado/Olchoro Onyore/173 since 14th February 1985. The Defendant's Defence did not deny the Plaintiff's proprietorship and no evidence was adduced to rebut it. Relying on section 26(1) of the Land Registration Act, the court held the title was prima facie evidence of ownership and indefeasible absent fraud or misrepresentation.

p. 2
02

Whether the Defendant encroached on the suit land

Holding

Yes; the presence of the Defendant's structures on the suit land was proof of encroachment, uncontroverted by any evidence

Reasoning

PW1 testified that the Defendant encroached and put up illegal structures. The District Land Registrar and District Surveyor visited the land in 2011 and concluded that illegal structures encroaching on the suit land should be removed. The Defendant did not appeal against that decision nor controvert the evidence, and the court held that the presence of the structures was itself proof of encroachment.

p. 3
03

Whether the Defendant should be evicted from the suit land

Holding

Yes; the Plaintiff, as registered owner, is entitled to protection of the law and quiet possession

Reasoning

The boundary dispute had been adjudicated in 2011 by the District Land Registrar and District Surveyor, whose findings the Defendant did not appeal or controvert. Relying on section 24(a) of the Land Registration Act and the Ahmed Ibrahim Suleiman authority, the court found the Plaintiff's vested rights should not be interfered with and, the Defendant having failed to prove his claim over the suit land, eviction was warranted.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • A certificate of title is prima facie evidence that the person named as proprietor is the absolute and indefeasible owner, subject only to challenge on grounds of fraud, misrepresentation, or illegal/unprocedural acquisition
  • Registration of a person as proprietor of land vests in that person absolute ownership together with all rights and privileges appurtenant thereto

Court orders

#
  1. 1.A declaration that the Plaintiff is the absolute proprietor of land parcel number Kajiado/Olchoro Onyore/173
  2. 2.An eviction order against the defendant, his servants or agents, from parcel Kajiado/Olchoro Onyore/173
  3. 3.Costs of the suit awarded to the Plaintiff

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Land Registration Actsection 26(1)
  • Land Registration Actsection 24(a)

Cases cited (1)

  • Ahmed Ibrahim Suleiman and Another vs. Noor Khamisi Surur
    (2013) eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Environment and Land Court jurisdiction over disputes relating to land (Environment and Land Court Act); suit instituted by Plaint dated 20th June 2014

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Eliud Kimotho Chabi v Sankale Ole Lankas (Environment & Land Case 661 of 2017) [2018] KEELC 3328 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2018). ELC Case No. 661 of 2017. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2018/3328/eng@2018-04-04

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.