Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNot stated in judgment· [2018] KEELC 3042 (KLR)

Felix Mutua Nzamu (Suing as the legal representative of the estate of Samuel Nzamu Maingi v Makueni County Police Commander & another [2018] KEELC 3042 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court / High Court at Makueni
30 May 2018
821 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Makueni court refused to stop land dealings because the applicants never answered forgery allegations against their ownership documents.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was an interlocutory Notice of Motion by the Plaintiffs/Applicants under Order 40 and Order 51 of the Civil Procedure Rules and the Land Acquisition Act Cap 295 seeking a temporary injunction restraining the Defendants/Respondents from fencing, alienating, subdividing, selling or constructing on the suit property pending the hearing of the main suit. The application was supported by the affidavit of the second Plaintiff, Shedrack Mwau Nzamu, who annexed an allotment letter and ownership documents said to belong to the estate of Samuel Nzamu Maingi. The Respondents opposed through the replying and further affidavits of the first Defendant, Joseph Ole Napeiyan, questioning the authenticity of the Applicants' documents and alleging forgery. Both parties accepted that the principles in Giella v Cassman Brown & Co Ltd governed the application, the Applicants also citing American Cyanamid v Ethicon and the Respondents citing the Court of Appeal decision in Kenya Commercial Finance Co Ltd v Afraha Education Society for the sequential nature of the inquiry. After written submissions, Mbogo CG J held that the Applicants had not established a prima facie case with probability of success because the ownership documents they relied on had been challenged in the Respondents' further affidavit and those depositions were unchallenged. The second and third Giella conditions were not addressed. The application was dismissed with costs to the Respondents on 30th May 2018 at Makueni.

Key legal issues

#
01

Prima facie case with probability of success

Holding

The Applicants failed to establish one because the authenticity of their ownership documents was challenged in the Respondents' further affidavit and those depositions were unchallenged

Reasoning

The Applicants relied on an allotment letter and ownership documents annexed as SMN-4 for the estate of Samuel Nzamu Maingi. The Respondents, in paragraphs 5 and 6 of their further affidavit, questioned the authenticity of those documents and alleged forgery. The Applicants did not challenge those depositions, so the court accepted that the ownership claim was in doubt and the first Giella principle was not satisfied.

p. 2
02

Sequential application of the Giella conditions

Holding

Where the first condition fails, the court need not address the second and third conditions

Reasoning

Relying on the Court of Appeal decision in Kenya Commercial Finance Co. Ltd v Afraha Education Society, the court adopted the sequential approach to the interlocutory injunction enquiry. Having found no prima facie case, the second (balance of convenience) and third (adequacy of damages) conditions were not reached and the application was dismissed.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • The conditions in Giella are sequential; failure of the first (prima facie case) is fatal and the court need not consider the remaining conditions

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice of Motion dated 20th June 2017 seeking a temporary injunction was dismissed
  2. 2.Costs of the application awarded to the Respondents

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure Rules 2010Order 51 Rule 1; Order 40 Rules 1, 2 & 4
  • Land Acquisition Act Cap 295Sections 3, 4(2), 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13
  • Civil Procedure ActSections 1A, 1B and 3A

Cases cited (3)

  • GIELLA –VS- CASSMAN BROWN & CO. LTD
    [1973] EA 358
  • AMERICAN CYNAMID CO VS ETHICON LTD
    [1975] ALL ER 504
  • KENYA COMMERCIAL FINANCE CO. LTD –VS- AFRAHA EDUCATION SOCIETY
    (2001) IEA 86
Jurisdiction invoked
Order 51 Rule 1 and Order 40 Rules 1, 2 & 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules 2010; sections 3, 4(2), 5–13 of the Land Acquisition Act Cap 295; Sections 1A, 1B and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Felix Mutua Nzamu (Suing as the legal representative of the estate of Samuel Nzamu Maingi v Makueni County Police Commander & another [2018] KEELC 3042 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2018). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2018/3042/eng@2018-05-30

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.