Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedNotice of Motion dated 3rd November 2016 (suit at Nakuru, Environment and Land Court)· [2018] KEELC 2799 (KLR)

Diana Lee Lasoi & another v John Kiptoo Cheruiyot & 2 others [2018] KEELC 2799 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
19 June 2018
2,118 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~8 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Nakuru court blocked the sale of disputed land, ruling the agents involved were unregistered and their contract likely illegal in Kenya.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
By Notice of Motion dated 3rd November 2016, the plaintiffs, the administratrix of the estate of Solomon Kipkorir Arap Lasoi (deceased) and her donee of a general power of attorney, sought temporary and permanent injunctions restraining the defendants from advertising or selling land parcel Nakuru/Olenguruone/Cheptuech/269, release of the original title deed, and an account of dealings by the 1st defendant under powers of attorney, including release of certificates of title to four other properties. The 1st defendant did not enter appearance. The 2nd and 3rd defendants, estate agents engaged by the 1st defendant who held the title deed under an agreement dated 8th September 2015 securing commission of Kshs.5,825,000, opposed the application, arguing the 2nd plaintiff lacked authority to sue and that the 1st defendant had a specific power of attorney to dispose of the suit property. The court dismissed prayers 4, 5 and 6: the permanent injunction was inappropriate on an interlocutory application, and prayers 5 and 6 were mandatory injunctions which, per Lucy Wangui Gachara v Minudi Okemba Lore, require special circumstances or the clearest of cases. Applying Giella v Cassman Brown as sequenced in Nguruman Limited v Jan Bonde Nielsen, the court found a prima facie case with probability of success and irreparable harm, because a letter from the Estate Agents Registration Board established that the 2nd and 3rd defendants were unregistered, making their agency agreement potentially illegal and unenforceable under sections 7 and 18 of Cap 533, following Mapis Investment (K) Limited v Kenya Railways Corporation. The court granted an injunction restraining advertisement or sale of the suit property pending hearing and determination of the suit and awarded costs of the application to the plaintiffs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Mandatory injunction at interlocutory stage

Holding

Prayers 5 and 6 refused; they amounted to mandatory injunctions that would determine the suit in a summary manner

Reasoning

The court found the prayers mirrored substantive prayers in the plaint. Relying on Lucy Wangui Gachara v Minudi Okemba Lore, it held mandatory injunctions at interlocutory stage require special circumstances or the clearest of cases, as they summarily determine disputes and deny parties a full hearing with cross-examination. No special circumstances were shown.

p. 2
02

Permanent injunction on interlocutory application

Holding

Refused; such relief can only be granted after a full hearing of the suit

Reasoning

The court held that granting a permanent injunction on a notice of motion would in effect amount to granting final judgment without trial. The proper remedy at the interlocutory stage is a temporary injunction pending hearing and determination of the suit.

p. 2
03

Interlocutory injunction - prima facie case and irreparable harm

Holding

Granted; plaintiffs established a prima facie case with probability of success and would suffer irreparable damage if the suit property were sold

Reasoning

Applying Giella as sequenced in Nguruman, the court found the 2nd and 3rd defendants intended to sell the suit property to recover commission under an agency agreement with the 1st defendant. That agreement might be unenforceable for illegality since the agents were unregistered under the Estate Agents Act, giving the plaintiffs a prima facie case; sale before trial would cause irreparable damage.

p. 3
04

Illegality of unregistered estate agents' contract

Holding

Under sections 7 and 18 of the Estate Agents Act (Cap 533), it would be illegal and a criminal offence for unregistered persons to practise as estate agents

Reasoning

A letter from the Estate Agents Registration Board dated 11th May 2017 confirmed the 2nd and 3rd defendants were unregistered, and they offered no evidence to challenge it. Following Mapis Investment (K) Limited v Kenya Railways Corporation, a contract to perform estate agency services is only legal if made with a registered agent; the agency agreement might therefore be unenforceable for illegality.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • All three Giella conditions are separate, distinct and logical hurdles to be surmounted sequentially; if no prima facie case, the other limbs need not be considered
  • Mandatory injunctions at the interlocutory stage should not be granted absent special circumstances or in the clearest of cases
  • A contract for estate agency services can only be legal if entered into with a registered estate agent

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Prayers 4, 5 and 6 of the Notice of Motion dismissed
  2. 2.An injunction granted restraining the defendants from advertising or selling the property known as Nakuru/Olenguruone/Cheptuech/269 pending hearing and determination of the suit
  3. 3.Costs of the application awarded to the plaintiffs
Jurisdiction invoked
Original civil jurisdiction over land disputes; notice of motion for interlocutory relief under civil procedure (no specific constitutional provision invoked)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Diana Lee Lasoi & another v John Kiptoo Cheruiyot & 2 others [2018] KEELC 2799 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2018). Notice of Motion dated 3rd November 2016 (suit at Nakuru, Environment and Land Court). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2018/2799/eng@2018-06-19

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.