Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedOriginating Summons dated 3/11/2014· [2018] KEELC 2702 (KLR)

Alice Muhonja Kirambi v Redempta Susan Chetambe & another [2018] KEELC 2702 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
14 June 2018
3,384 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~14 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court gave land to a buyer who occupied it openly for over 12 years after the sale agreement lapsed for lack of Land Control Board consent.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The plaintiff brought an Originating Summons dated 3/11/2014 seeking a declaration that she had acquired title to Title No. Trans-Nzoia/Liyavo/187, measuring about 4.0 Ha in Kitale, Trans-Nzoia, by adverse possession, registration as proprietor in place of the registered owner, an order compelling the defendant to liquidate the Barclays Bank charge, vesting orders and costs. The plaintiff testified that she bought the land from the defendant in 1995-1996 for Kshs.680,000, paid the full consideration, took possession in 1996, fenced it, built a house and farmed it, but the transfer was never completed because the title deed could not be traced and the defendant owed Settlement Fund Trustees dues. The defendant denied selling, alleging a lapsed letter of offer and a subsequent lease at Kshs.2,000 per acre, from which she admitted receiving Kshs.300,000. After a de novo hearing following a consent order, the court framed three issues: whether adverse possession was proved, what orders should issue, and costs. The court found the plaintiff took possession in 1996 and that her occupation was open, peaceful and uninterrupted for over 12 years, with no re-entry or recovery suit by the defendant. The defendant's lease version was found not credible. Judgment was entered for the plaintiff in terms of prayers (A), (B), (D) and (E), with the Deputy Registrar authorised to execute the transfer documents on the defendant's behalf. Prayer (C), on the Barclays Bank charge, was not granted.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the plaintiff proved the ingredients of adverse possession

Holding

Yes - the plaintiff was in open, peaceful and continuous occupation of the suit land for more than 12 years, since 1996, and her title by adverse possession was extinguishing of the defendant's title

Reasoning

The court found credible evidence that the plaintiff paid Kshs.340,000 on 26/4/1995 and Kshs.280,000 on 12/7/1995 as final payment of the sale consideration. With no Land Control Board consent within six months, the agreement became void on 11/1/1996 and time ran from then. Her occupation was open, without force or secrecy, uninterrupted for over 12 years, with no re-entry or suit for recovery by the defendant.

p. 4
02

When time began to run for purposes of prescriptive rights

Holding

Time ran from 11/1/1996, six months after the last payment of the sale consideration, when the agreement became void for want of Land Control Board consent

Reasoning

The court found the sale agreement dated from the payment of Kshs.280,000 on 12/7/1995. Consent to transfer ought to have been obtained within six months. As none was granted, the agreement became void on 11/1/1996 and the plaintiff's occupation from that date was adverse. Alternatively, the plaintiff's own case was occupation since 1996, over 12 years before suit.

p. 3
03

Whether the defendant's alleged lease arrangement explained the plaintiff's occupation

Holding

No - no written lease or evidence of periodic payments was produced, and the defendant's version was not credible

Reasoning

The defendant alleged a lease at Kshs.2,000 per acre from 1996, but produced no written lease or evidence of periodic payments. The court found it implausible that Kshs.300,000 was paid for such a lease, and noted the defendant's own affidavit offered to refund the Kshs.300,000 upon the plaintiff vacating, inconsistent with a spent lease.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • To prove adverse possession a plaintiff must take possession, assert rights adverse to the owner's title, and be in open, continuous, peaceful and public possession without force or secrecy for at least 12 years
  • An action to recover land may not be brought after the end of twelve years from the date the right of action accrued
  • Where a sale agreement required Land Control Board consent and no consent was obtained within six months, the agreement becomes void at the expiry of six months and time for adverse possession may run from that date

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Judgment entered in favour of the plaintiff against the defendant in terms of prayers (A), (B), (D) and (E) of the Originating Summons dated 3/11/2014
  2. 2.Declaration that the plaintiff has acquired title to Title No. Trans-Nzoia/Liyavo/187 by adverse possession
  3. 3.The plaintiff to be registered as proprietor of Title No. Trans-Nzoia/Liyavo/187 in place of the defendant
  4. 4.An order vesting rights in respect of Title No. Trans-Nzoia/Liyavo/187 in the plaintiff in the place of the defendant
  5. 5.Costs of the Originating Summons awarded to the plaintiff
  6. 6.The Deputy Registrar of the Court to execute on the defendant's behalf all necessary documents required to effect the transfer of the suit property into the plaintiff's name

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Registered Land ActCap 300 (repealed)
  • Land Registration ActSection 28(h)
  • Land ActSection 7(1)
  • Limitation of Actions ActSection 7
Jurisdiction invoked
Original jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court under the Environment and Land Court Act over title and occupation of land (suit property Title No. Trans-Nzoia/Liyavo/187)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Alice Muhonja Kirambi v Redempta Susan Chetambe & another [2018] KEELC 2702 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2018). Originating Summons dated 3/11/2014. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2018/2702/eng@2018-06-14

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.