Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedNotice of Motion dated 20/2/2017 and Notice of Motion dated 3/5/2017 (Environmental and Land Court, Nairobi)· [2018] KEELC 2133 (KLR)

Parliamentary Service Commission & another v Captain James Nyongesa Wafubwa [2018] KEELC 2133 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
31 July 2018
1,653 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Environment and Land Court stopped a former owner from evicting a property's current owner, ruling the case was not a repeat of earlier litigation.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The court determined two opposed applications arising from a dispute over LR Number 209/1048/85 in South C, Nairobi. The plaintiffs sought an interlocutory injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with, trespassing on, or threatening the 2nd plaintiff's possession of the suit property; the 2nd plaintiff is the registered proprietor, having bought the property from John Wambua Kiilu, who acquired it from Housing Finance Company of Kenya Limited in exercise of its statutory power of sale, while the 1st plaintiff holds a charge securing Kshs 6,300,000. The defendant applied to dismiss the suit as res judicata and an abuse of process, relying on Nairobi HCCC No 385 of 2011 between Captain J N Wafubwa and HFCK. The court held that the plea of res judicata failed: the plaintiffs were not parties to that suit or the appeal, and the present cause of action, arising from threats in 2017, accrued after both the High Court judgment of 2012 and the Court of Appeal judgment of 2014. On the injunction, applying Giella v Cassman Brown, the court found a prima facie case and irreparable harm established: the defendant's own affidavit confirmed his intent to evict, and prior courts had declined to annul the sale to Kiilu. The defendant's application was dismissed with costs to the plaintiffs, and the plaintiffs' application was allowed in terms of prayers 4 and 5, restraining the defendant's interference with the suit property.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the suit is res judicata and an abuse of process

Holding

The suit is neither res judicata nor an abuse of the process of the court; the essential elements of Section 7 are absent

Reasoning

The parties in Nairobi HCCC No 385/2011 were Captain J N Wafubwa and Housing Finance Company of Kenya; the plaintiffs herein were never admitted as parties or bound by its determinations. Further, the cause of action here arose from threats issued in January and February 2017, long after the High Court judgment of 26/4/2012 and the Court of Appeal judgment of 28/3/2014. Different parties and different causes of action defeat the plea.

p. 2
02

Whether the criteria for an interlocutory injunction were satisfied

Holding

The first and second limbs of Giella v Cassman Brown were satisfied and the injunction was granted in terms of prayers 4 and 5

Reasoning

It was uncontested that the 2nd plaintiff is the registered proprietor in possession and the 1st plaintiff holds a charge over the suit property. The defendant's own replying affidavit affirmed his intent to evict the 2nd plaintiff, confirming the threat to the right to quiet possession. Prior courts declined to annul the sale to John Wambua Kiilu, from whom the 2nd plaintiff purchased, so the title stands unrevoked.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Res judicata under Section 7 of the Civil Procedure Act requires that the matter directly and substantially in issue was heard and finally decided in a former suit between the same parties or parties under whom they claim, litigating under the same title, in a competent court
  • Parties who were not parties to the earlier suit or its determinations cannot be barred by res judicata

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The defendant's Notice of Motion dated 3/5/2017 is dismissed; the plaintiffs shall have costs of the application
  2. 2.The plaintiffs' Notice of Motion dated 20/2/2017 is allowed in terms of prayers 4 and 5 of the application

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure ActSection 7

Cases cited (3)

  • John Florence Maritime Services Limited & Ano. v Cabinet Secretary for Transport and Infrastructure & 3 Others
    (2015) e KLR
  • Henderson v Henderson
    (1843) 67 ER 313
  • Giella v Cassman Brown
    (1973) EA 358
Jurisdiction invoked
Original civil jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court over the suit property LR Number 209/1048/85, South C, Nairobi

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Parliamentary Service Commission & another v Captain James Nyongesa Wafubwa [2018] KEELC 2133 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2018). Notice of Motion dated 20/2/2017 and Notice of Motion dated 3/5/2017 (Environmental and Land Court, Nairobi). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2018/2133/eng@2018-07-31

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.