Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedNot stated in the judgment· [2018] KEELC 1983 (KLR)

Gilbert Kimutai Koech v Wilson Kipngeno Koech [2018] KEELC 1983 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court of Kenya
30 August 2018
1,703 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan land court gave a late appellant extra time to appeal and paused execution of judgment, but only after he deposited security for costs.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Kericho (J.M Onyango, J) on the Plaintiff/Applicant's notice of application dated 3rd July 2018 seeking two principal prayers: leave to appeal out of time against the whole judgment and decree delivered on 18th May 2018 (which had dismissed his suit with costs), and a temporary stay of execution of that judgment pending his intended appeal in the Court of Appeal. The Defendant/Respondent opposed the application through a replying affidavit sworn on 13th July 2018, contending that no serious arguable issues of law were raised, that the applicant was not entitled to stay, and that the application was an abuse of court process. The applicant explained his delay by a road traffic accident on 11th May 2018, and argued substantial loss: he had occupied the suit land for over forty years, made substantial developments, lived there with his aging mother, and feared his late father's grave would be desecrated if execution proceeded. The court framed two issues: whether the conditions for leave to appeal out of time were satisfied, and whether the applicant was entitled to stay of execution pending appeal. Relying on section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act and authorities on extension of time, the judge accepted the accident explanation despite the absence of medical records, found merit in the application, granted leave to file the appeal within 14 days, and issued a stay of execution conditional on the plaintiff depositing Kshs. 75,000 as security for costs within 21 days, failing which the stay lapses. Costs of the application were awarded against the plaintiff. Dated, signed and delivered at Kericho on 30th August 2018.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether leave to appeal out of time should be granted

Holding

Leave granted; the applicant's road traffic accident was accepted as a plausible explanation for the delay notwithstanding absence of medical records.

Reasoning

The court has wide discretionary power under section 79G to extend time, to be exercised judicially. The applicant attributed the delay to a road traffic accident. Although no medical records were annexed, only a photograph of the damaged car, the court accepted the explanation and found a strong case for extension of time.

p. 3
02

Whether stay of execution pending appeal should be granted

Holding

Stay granted conditionally upon deposit of security for costs.

Reasoning

The applicant stood to suffer substantial loss not compensable in damages - he had occupied the suit land for over forty years and his father was buried there, raising fear of desecration of the grave. The court balanced the respondent's entitlement to the fruits of judgment against the applicant's right of appeal, and granted stay conditional on a deposit of Kshs. 75,000 as security for costs within 21 days, failing which the stay lapses.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • The power to grant extension of time is discretionary and must be exercised judicially to do justice, with each case depending on its own merits.
  • An applicant for extension of time must give a plausible explanation for the delay.
  • In stay applications the court must balance the respondent's right to enjoy the fruits of judgment against the applicant's right of appeal.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Applicant is granted leave to appeal out of time against the whole judgment and decree delivered on 18th May, 2018, the appeal to be filed within 14 days
  2. 2.Stay of execution issued against the judgment and decree pending the appeal in the Court of Appeal, on condition that the Plaintiff deposits Kshs. 75,000 as security for costs within 21 days, failing which the stay automatically lapses
  3. 3.Costs of the application to be borne by the Plaintiff/Applicant

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure Act, Cap 21 Laws of KenyaSection 79G

Cases cited (3)

  • Edward Njane Nganga & another v Damaris Wanjiku Kamau & another
    [2016] eKLR
  • Aviation Cargo Support Limited v St. Mark Freight Services Limited
    (2014) eKLR
  • Sayers v Clarke Walker (a firm)
    2002 EWCA Civ 645
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act, Cap 21 Laws of Kenya, as shared with courts of equal status (ELC and ELRC)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Gilbert Kimutai Koech v Wilson Kipngeno Koech [2018] KEELC 1983 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2018). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2018/1983/eng@2018-08-30

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.