Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedNot stated in judgment· [2018] KEELC 1472 (KLR)

George Kamau Githae v Moses Cheboi [2018] KEELC 1472 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
25 September 2018
898 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Environment and Land Court confirmed a registered landowner's title and ordered a trespasser and his family off the land within 30 days.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
By a plaint dated 23rd March 2017 the plaintiff, the registered owner of parcel Uasin Gishu/Moiben Scheme/1 measuring 32.0 Ha, sued the defendant seeking his eviction, an order restraining him, his family, servants and agents from further trespassing, and costs. The plaintiff testified that he obtained the land in 1975 through the Settlement Fund Trustee and was registered as owner on 28th July 2008, producing the letter of offer, the SFT charge, discharge of charge, transfer form, official search and title deed as exhibits. He alleged the defendant trespassed in 2016, refused to vacate despite demands and a report to the area Chief, and had procured the lodging of a caution by a purported purchaser although the plaintiff had never sold the land. The defendant filed a memorandum of appearance and a defence that was a general denial raising limitation; his advocates twice applied to cease acting, and he failed to appear at the hearing. The court framed three issues: ownership, entitlement to eviction, and limitation. It held the plaintiff's registered title was undisputed and not shown to be fraudulently or unprocedurally obtained, that the claim was tenable and not time barred since the trespass occurred in 2016, and that any adverse possession claim would fail because time does not run against the SFT and only 9 years had elapsed since the 2008 registration. Judgment was entered for the plaintiff: the defendant, his family, servants and agents were restrained from trespassing and ordered to give vacant possession within 30 days, failing which an eviction order would issue, and the defendant was ordered to pay the costs of the suit. Delivered at Eldoret on 25th September 2018.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the plaintiff is the bona fide registered owner of the suit land

Holding

Yes; the plaintiff produced a title deed registered in his name plus SFT allotment, charge, discharge and transfer documents, none of which were disputed as fraudulently or unprocedurally obtained

Reasoning

The plaintiff testified he was registered as owner on 28 July 2008 after allotment through the Settlement Fund Trustee in 1975. He produced the letter of offer, the SFT charge, discharge of charge, transfer form, official search and title deed as exhibits. The defendant's defence was a general denial offering no rival claim of ownership or mode of acquisition, so the title stood unchallenged.

p. 1
02

Whether the suit is time barred

Holding

No; the claim is tenable. The defendant trespassed in 2016 and the plaintiff sued promptly; any adverse possession claim would fail because time does not run against the SFT and only about 9 years had elapsed since registration in 2008

Reasoning

The defendant's only pleaded defence was limitation. The court found the claim arose from a 2016 trespass, so it was not time barred. Even on adverse possession, the land was discharged from the SFT in 2007 and transferred to the plaintiff on 28 July 2008; time does not run against the SFT, and from 2008 to 2017 only 9 years had elapsed, short of the 12 required.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Time for adverse possession does not run against the Settlement Fund Trustee
  • A registered owner who produces an undisputed title and proves allotment documents proves ownership entitling him to eviction and restraining orders

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The defendant, his family, servants and agents are restrained from trespassing and ordered to give the plaintiff vacant possession of parcel of land registration Number Uasin Gishu/Moiben Scheme/1 within 30 days failure of which an eviction order to issue
  2. 2.The defendant to pay costs of this suit
Jurisdiction invoked
Original civil suit on land ownership and eviction (plaint dated 23rd March 2017)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "George Kamau Githae v Moses Cheboi [2018] KEELC 1472 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2018). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2018/1472/eng@2018-09-25

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.