Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedNot stated in the excerpt (Chuka ELC suit, inhibition application dated 3rd October 2018)· [2018] KEELC 1298 (KLR)

Irvine Mwenda Japhet v M’kanga M’rwito Kanyinyiro [2018] KEELC 1298 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
23 October 2018
413 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~2 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court confirmed that when a land case is dismissed, any freeze on the property ends automatically—but even a winning party got no costs.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The defendant, M'Kanga M'rwito Kanyinyiro, moved the court by notice of motion dated 3rd October 2018, brought under Sections 3, 3A and 63e of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 51 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules, seeking the lifting of an order of inhibition and any other restriction over parcel No. MWIMBI/CHOGORIA/4652. He deponed that the respondent had inhibited the land on 31st October 2011 by an order issued on 2nd November 2011, that the main suit had been dismissed in early 2018 (specifically 7th February 2018), and that the inhibition still encumbered the land, preventing him from dealing with it. The court held that the dismissal of the suit meant that all orders issued in it were automatically invalid and had been vacated by the dismissal. It accordingly allowed the application in terms of prayer 2, lifting the inhibition over the suit parcel. However, on costs, the court found that the applicant was equally to blame for the dismissal of the suit and declined to award him costs, directing that no costs be awarded in the main suit or in the application. The judgment was delivered in open court at Chuka on 23rd October 2018 by P.M. Njoroge J, with Charles Muchiri holding brief for Mwanzia for the defendant and CA Ndegwa present.

Key legal issues

#
01

Effect of dismissal of the main suit on subsisting inhibition orders

Holding

Orders of inhibition issued in a suit automatically become invalid and are vacated upon dismissal of the suit

Reasoning

The court reasoned that the suit having been dismissed on 7th February 2018, there was no longer any basis for the inhibition order registered over parcel MWIMBI/CHOGORIA/4652 on 31st October 2011. Orders issued in a pending suit cannot survive the suit's determination, so the defendant was entitled to have the land freed from the restriction. Costs were denied because the applicant contributed to the dismissal.

p. 1
02

Whether the applicant was entitled to costs

Holding

Costs were refused because the applicant bore equal blame for the dismissal of the suit

Reasoning

Although the application succeeded, the court exercised its discretion on costs against the applicant. The dismissal of the main suit in early 2018 was attributable in part to the applicant himself, and the court considered it unfair to visit the costs on the respondent. The court therefore made no award of costs either in the main suit or in the application.

p. 1

Legal principles established

#
  • Upon dismissal of a suit, any interlocutory orders issued therein, including orders of inhibition, lapse automatically

Court orders

#
  1. 1.This application is allowed in terms of prayer 2 thereof
  2. 2.No costs are awarded in the main suit and in this application

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure ActSections 3, 3A, 63e
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 51 Rule 1
Jurisdiction invoked
Sections 3, 3A, 63e of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 51 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Irvine Mwenda Japhet v M’kanga M’rwito Kanyinyiro [2018] KEELC 1298 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2018). Not stated in the excerpt (Chuka ELC suit, inhibition application dated 3rd October 2018). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2018/1298/eng@2018-10-23

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.