Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedELC Case No. 75 of 2012· [2018] KEELC 1205 (KLR)

Nathan Anduku Likalamu v Dickson Juma Kimungui [2018] KEELC 1205 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
16 October 2018
1,067 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kakamega court ordered a land occupier evicted because a registered title deed is nearly unbeatable in Kenya unless you prove fraud.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The plaintiff sued for eviction of the defendant from a portion of land parcel No. Kakamega/Sango/970. He claimed that in 1993 his son, Anthony Shifwoko Anduku (PW2), purchased the parcel from William B. Kimungui for Kshs. 120,000 paid in three instalments, and that the land was transferred and registered in the plaintiff's name in 2000, upon which he obtained a title deed. He alleged that the defendant, son of the vendor, encroached on the parcel, constructed a house and refused to vacate despite demands. The defendant denied the sale agreement and the vendor's registration, and alleged the plaintiff's registration was procured by fraud. However, in testimony the defendant admitted his father sold the land to PW2, that he witnessed the sale, that the purchase price was taken and that he did not object. The court applied sections 24(a) and 26(1) of the Land Registration Act, holding a certificate of title prima facie evidence of absolute and indefeasible ownership, challengeable only on fraud to which the proprietor is party or where acquired illegally, unprocedurally or through a corrupt scheme. It applied Elijah Makeri Nyangw'ra v Stephen Mungai Njuguna & Another on these two grounds. Finding the fraud allegation unproved and ownership established on a balance of probabilities, the court held the defendant a trespasser denying the plaintiff peaceful enjoyment. It ordered the defendant to vacate within three months, failing which eviction to issue forthwith, with costs to the defendant. Judgment delivered at Kakamega on 16 October 2018.

Key legal issues

#
01

Indefeasibility of title under the Land Registration Act

Holding

The plaintiff's certificate of title is prima facie evidence of absolute ownership and was not successfully challenged on fraud or illegality.

Reasoning

The court applied sections 24(a) and 26(1) of the Land Registration Act, which protect registered proprietors' titles. The plaintiff was the registered owner, and the defendant failed to prove the fraud alleged in the defence. The court relied on Elijah Makeri Nyangw'ra on the only two grounds for challenging title: fraud or misrepresentation to which the proprietor is a party, or acquisition illegally, unprocedurally or through a corrupt scheme.

p. 2
02

Trespass and rights of a registered proprietor

Holding

The defendant's continued occupation was trespass denying the plaintiff quiet enjoyment, entitling the plaintiff to eviction.

Reasoning

The defendant admitted his father sold the land and that he witnessed the sale and took the purchase price without objection. The court found the plaintiff proved ownership on a balance of probabilities and that a registered proprietor is entitled to exclusive, peaceful and unfettered possession, justifying an eviction order with a three-month grace period.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Registration of a person as proprietor of land vests absolute ownership in that person.
  • A certificate of title is prima facie evidence of absolute and indefeasible ownership, challengeable only on fraud or illegality.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.That the defendant to vacate the suit parcel No. Kakamega/Sango/970, within the next 3 (three) months from the dated of this judgement and in default eviction order to issue forthwith.
  2. 2.Costs of the suit be borne by the defendant.
Jurisdiction invoked
Original civil jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court over disputes relating to ownership and occupation of land

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Nathan Anduku Likalamu v Dickson Juma Kimungui [2018] KEELC 1205 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2018). ELC Case No. 75 of 2012. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2018/1205/eng@2018-10-16

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.