Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedMisc. Application No. 9 of 2017 (formerly Misc. Civil Application No. 115 of 2014 (O.S))· [2018] KEELC 254 (KLR)

Joseph Evans Okwany & another v Roslida Mbaja Malawo [2018] KEELC 254 (KLR)

Environment & Land Court
29 November 2018
3,666 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~15 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court confirmed that paying for land, taking possession, and staying over 12 years gives you ownership even without a title transfer.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was an adverse possession claim brought by originating summons under section 38 of the Limitation of Actions Act, seeking a declaration that the plaintiffs, who purchased a 41 x 75m portion of the original Kisumu/Kogony/1688 from the defendant on 4th December 1991 for Kshs. 48,000, had acquired the subdivided parcel Kisumu/Kogony/4661 by adverse possession, an order directing the Kisumu District Lands Registrar to register their interests, and entitlement to compensation upon compulsory acquisition by the Kenya Roads Authority for the Kisumu Northern ByPass. The defendant was served but filed no response despite being granted an extension after her son pleaded illness; the matter proceeded by formal proof. Joseph Evans Okwany testified and produced the sale agreement, mutation form, official search and Gazette Notice No. 20 of 27th February 2015. The court applied Mtana Lewa v Kahindi Ngala Mwagandi on the ingredients of adverse possession and Willy Kimutai Kitilit v Michael Kibet on constructive trusts arising from land sales without Land Control Board consent. Holding that time began running in December 1991 upon payment and taking of possession, and that possession had been open, continuous and hostile for over 27 years, the court found the defendant's title extinguished and that she held the land in trust for the plaintiffs. The court allowed all the plaintiffs' prayers in the originating summons with costs. The defendant took no part in the proceedings.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the plaintiffs acquired Kisumu/Kogony/4661 by adverse possession

Holding

Yes - the plaintiffs purchased an identifiable portion measuring 41 x 75m on 4th December 1991, paid the full purchase price, took possession and fenced it; the defendant's title was extinguished after more than 12 years and she held the land in trust for the plaintiffs.

Reasoning

The court applied the settled ingredients of adverse possession from Mtana Lewa and the Limitation of Actions Act (sections 7, 13, 37 and 38). Time began running on execution of the sale agreement and taking of possession in December 1991, making the possession over 27 years old. The defendant filed no response and adduced no rebuttal evidence at formal proof. The court also invoked constructive trust principles from Willy Kimutai Kitilit, noting the defendant subdivided and registered the land in her own name while already a trustee of the plaintiffs' interest.

p. 5
02

Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to registration and compensation upon acquisition of the land by the Kenya Roads Authority

Holding

Yes - having established title by adverse possession, the plaintiffs are entitled to have their rights registered on Kisumu/Kogony/4661 and to compensation when the land is acquired, the Gazette Notice having already recognised them alongside the defendant.

Reasoning

Counsel submitted, and the court accepted in allowing all prayers, that under section 38 of the Limitation of Actions Act the Land Registrar should register the plaintiffs' interests, and that the gazette notice for the Kisumu Northern ByPass listed the plaintiffs as proprietors of Kisumu/Kogony/4661 together with the defendant. Since the defendant's title was extinguished, any transfer to a third party would be null and void.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • A purchaser who pays the full purchase price and takes possession may acquire title by adverse possession after twelve years, the vendor becoming a trustee of the title
  • Time for adverse possession runs from the date of payment of the purchase price where the purchaser takes possession
  • Possession must be adequate in continuity, publicity and extent, and not by force, stealth or licence
  • A seller who puts a purchaser into occupation holds the land in trust; equity will give effect to a constructive trust notwithstanding lack of Land Control Board consent

Court orders

#
  1. 1.A declaration that the plaintiffs have acquired the suit land (Kisumu/Kogony/4661, being a portion of the original Kisumu/Kogony/1688 measuring 41 x 75m) by way of adverse possession
  2. 2.The plaintiffs' prayers in the originating summons are allowed
  3. 3.Costs of the suit awarded to the plaintiffs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Land Registration Act 2012 (Cap 284)
  • Limitation of Actions Act (Cap 22)Section 38
  • Limitation of Actions Act (Cap 22)Section 7
  • Limitation of Actions Act (Cap 22)Section 13
  • Limitation of Actions Act (Cap 22)Section 37
  • Limitation of Actions Act (Cap 22)Section 17
  • Limitation of Actions Act (Cap 22)Section 18(4)
  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010Order 37 Rule 7
  • Land Control Act

Cases cited (5)

  • Kweyu versus Omutut
    [1990] KLR 709
  • Public Trustee versus Wanduru
    (1984) KLR 314
  • Peter Mbiri Michuki v Samuel Mugo Michuki
    [2014] eKLR
  • Mtana Lewa v Kahindi Ngala Mwagandi
    [2015] eKLR
  • Willy Kimutai Kitilit v Michael Kibet
    [2018] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 38 of the Limitation of Actions Act (Cap 22) and the Land Registration Act 2012, invoked by originating summons under Order 37 Rule 7 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Later judgments citing this (1)

#

Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Joseph Evans Okwany & another v Roslida Mbaja Malawo [2018] KEELC 254 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2018). Misc. Application No. 9 of 2017 (formerly Misc. Civil Application No. 115 of 2014 (O.S)). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2018/254/eng@2018-11-29

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.