Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedNot stated in the ruling (referenced only by the Notice of Motion dated 22nd June 2018)· [2018] KEELC 197 (KLR)

Planet Foods Limited & 3 others v James David Abilla & 8 others [2018] KEELC 197 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
27 November 2018
1,862 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan land buyer who lost Kshs.140 million to a fake seller can join government land officials in the lawsuit and seek compensation from them.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling of the Environment and Land Court (Obaga J, Nairobi, 27 November 2018) determines a Notice of Motion dated 22 June 2018 by the 1st to 5th defendants, trustees of the 6th defendant which bought LR No.209/20529/3 (a subdivision of the 1st plaintiff's LR No.209/20529) for over Kshs.140,000,000 raised by its members. The plaintiffs allege the land was illegally subdivided and sold by a fake company using the 1st respondent's name, whose purported directors are the 8th and 9th defendants. The applicants sought extension of time to comply with an order of Okong'o J of 4 April 2016, joinder of the Chief Land Registrar, Director of Surveys and Attorney General as 10th to 12th defendants, and leave to amend their defence to include a counter-claim for indemnity, arguing they purchased after due diligence and assurances from the lands offices. The respondents opposed, contending the application was late, an abuse of process and prejudicial. Counsel abandoned the extension prayer, leaving joinder and amendment for determination. The court held joinder necessary so it could effectually adjudicate, implement any cancellation of titles and adjudicate any indemnity claim. Amendment was allowed since it flowed from evidence unexpectedly adduced, only one witness had concluded testimony, and no prejudice would result. The application was allowed in terms of prayers (c) and (d); pleadings to be amended within 14 days; summons on new defendants only; costs of the application to the respondents.

Key legal issues

#
01

Joinder of the Chief Land Registrar, Director of Surveys and Attorney General

Holding

Joinder was necessary because the court could not pass an effective decree without them, and the applicants' indemnity claim could not be adjudicated in their absence

Reasoning

The dispute concerns a fake company selling land, with the purchase facilitated by the Ministry of Lands, the Chief Land Registrar, the Director of Survey and other government institutions represented by the Attorney General. The 6th defendant spent over Kshs.140,000,000 on the purchase and may seek indemnity if government officers were complicit or negligent. The Chief Land Registrar would also be needed to implement any order cancelling titles. Third party notice would not have been an appropriate remedy.

p. 3
02

Amendment of defence to include a counter-claim

Holding

Amendment allowed; the amendments were necessitated by evidence that emerged during the plaintiffs' case and no prejudice would be suffered by the respondents

Reasoning

Amendments should be freely allowed at any stage absent prejudice. The applicants explained the delay: evidence from the Companies Registry and police investigations was adduced by witnesses who had not recorded statements, and the applicants had no prior notice of the investigations' contents. Only one witness had testified to conclusion and the second was stood down, so the case would not necessarily start de novo and no prejudice would arise.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • The main consideration on joinder of parties is whether the joinder will enable the court to effectually and completely adjudicate on the issues in controversy.
  • Amendments to pleadings should be given freely at any stage as long as the amendments do not prejudice the other party.
  • Allowing a counter-claim is one way of ensuring there is no filing of multiple cases.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The applicants' application allowed in terms of prayer (c) and (d): leave granted to join the Chief Land Registrar, Director of Surveys of Kenya and the Attorney General as 10th, 11th and 12th defendants
  2. 2.Leave granted to amend the defence to include a counter-claim as per the annexed draft defence
  3. 3.Pleadings to be amended within 14 days from the date of the ruling
  4. 4.Summons to enter appearance to be served upon the new defendants only
  5. 5.Costs of the application to be paid by the applicants to the respondents

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 1 Rule 15
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 8 Rule 7
Jurisdiction invoked
Original civil jurisdiction over land dispute; application under Order 1 Rule 15 and Order 8 of the Civil Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Planet Foods Limited & 3 others v James David Abilla & 8 others [2018] KEELC 197 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2018). Not stated in the ruling (referenced only by the Notice of Motion dated 22nd June 2018). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2018/197/eng@2018-11-27

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.