Washington Oduor Onwayo v Kenya Commercial Bank & another [2018] KEELC 175 (KLR)
The bottom line
#Kenya's High Court ruled that fundamental rights survive death, so estates can sue to enforce them under the 2010 Constitution.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Locus standi of an administrator to enforce the rights of a deceased person
An administrator of a deceased person's estate has locus standi to institute proceedings for enforcement of the deceased's fundamental rights under Article 22(1) and 258 of the Constitution
The court noted that a fundamental right attaches to the person of the right holder and does not die with him. Adopting comparative jurisprudence from the United States, India and South Africa, the court held that the words 'any person' in Articles 22(1) and 258(1) include persons acting for deceased persons. The purpose of Chapter Four is to protect rights, and the Constitution does not expressly exclude enforcement of rights of deceased persons.
Whether enforcement of fundamental rights is limited to living persons
The enforcement of fundamental rights and freedoms under the Constitution of Kenya, 2010 is not limited to living persons
The court reasoned that the Interpretation and General Provisions Act, read with Article 259(1) of the Constitution, leads to the conclusion that the words 'any person' under Articles 22(1) and 258(1) should be construed to include persons acting on behalf of deceased persons. Had the drafters intended to restrict enforcement to living persons, they would have stated so expressly.
Enforceability of pre-2010 violations under the Constitution of 2010
Persons who died before the promulgation of the Constitution of 2010 retain the rights and fundamental freedoms in the Bill of Rights which may be enforced by their personal representatives
Article 2 of the transitional and consequential provisions provides that the rights and fundamental freedoms in the Bill of Rights belong to each individual and are not granted by the State. The court found no reason in law or logic to conclude that a person who died before the promulgation of the Constitution is precluded from having his or her rights enforced by a personal representative.
Propriety of seeking declaratory relief on a standalone issue of locus standi
The court is empowered to issue declarations on the proper interpretation of the Constitution on a standalone basis where parties have legitimately invoked the court's jurisdiction
The petitioner deliberately limited his petition to the single issue of locus standi to unlock the court's jurisdiction. The respondents argued that a petition requires full factual substratum on the violations alleged and that a declaration on a standalone issue of standing is undesirable. The court nonetheless found jurisdiction to grant the declarations sought.
Legal principles established
#- A right under the Bill of Rights does not die with the person in whom it is vested; the right attaches to and follows the person of the deceased
- The Constitution of Kenya, 2010 does not limit enforcement of fundamental rights to living persons
- Persons who died before 27 August 2010 retain the rights and fundamental freedoms in the Bill of Rights and may have them enforced by their representatives
Court orders
#- 1.A declaration is hereby issued that the Petitioner has locus standi to file proceedings for the enforcement of the Bill of Rights on behalf of the late Sylvanus Onyango Oucho pursuant to Article 22(1) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010
- 2.A declaration is hereby issued that the jurisdiction of this court to hear and determine the enforcement of rights Petition includes the jurisdiction to hear and determine enforcement of rights of deceased persons who died prior to the promulgation of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010
- 3.A declaration is hereby issued that the Petitioner can file a Petition for the enforcement of the fundamental rights and freedoms of the late Sylvanus Onyango Oucho who died before the promulgation of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010
- 4.As the Petitioner has limited his Petition to the issue of locus standi, this court directs that the main Petition be listed for pre-trial directions and for hearing on priority basis before a Judge of the Constitutional and Judicial Review Division
- 5.The Deputy Registrar of the Constitutional and Judicial Review Division of this court does allocate this matter a fresh hearing date within 30 days of the date of delivery of this ruling
- 6.As this is a matter of public interest and the matter touches on the Bill of Rights, each party shall bear its own costs
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Articles 22(1), 22(2)(c), 258(1) and 258(2)(a) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Washington Oduor Onwayo v Kenya Commercial Bank & another [2018] KEELC 175 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2014). High Court Constitutional Petition No. 20 of 2013. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2018/175/eng@2018-11-15
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.