Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedNot stated in the excerpt (application dated 6 May 2016 in the suit commenced 12 August 2015)· [2017] KEELC 3868 (KLR)

Turbo Highway Eldoret Limited & another v Bank of Africa Kenya Limited; Kenol Kobil Ltd (Applicant) (Environment & Land Case 364 of 2015) [2017] KEELC 3868 (KLR)

Environment & Land Court
7 March 2017
2,452 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~10 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court ruled that a bank selling repossessed land must first offer it to the leaseholder at a fair valuation, though the sale itself was lawful.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
Kenol Kobil Company Limited, holding a registered 20-year lease (with an option of first purchase under Clause 6) over Eldoret Municipality/Block 12/131, applied for an injunction restraining Bank of Africa from selling the property in exercise of its statutory power of sale, and sought to be joined to the suit brought by Turbo Highway Eldoret Limited and Amit Aggarwal challenging the Bank's sale of charged parcels. The Bank opposed, noting the lessee had tendered a low offer of Kshs. 17.5 Million against a market value of Kshs. 55 Million and that its right had ceased. The court admitted Kenol Kobil as an interested party, treating it as assignee of the lease. On the merits, the court found no clause in the lease requiring the lessor to obtain the lessee's consent before charging the property, so the charge to the Bank was valid. However, under sections 31 and 42 of the repealed Registered Land Act, the earlier-registered lease took priority and the Bank was deemed to have notice of its terms, including the first right of purchase. The court held the Bank's statutory power of sale was not curtailed but must be deemed modified: the Bank must first offer the property to the lessee on the terms of Clause 6, with the price guided by three independent valuers, and only if the lessee fails to purchase may the Bank sell by auction or to others. The injunction sought was effectively not granted in absolute terms; instead, the court directed the manner of sale and ordered each party to bear its own costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the lessor required the lessee's consent before charging the property

Holding

No - the lease contained no such clause, so the property was properly charged to the Bank

Reasoning

The court examined the lease instrument and found no term obliging the lessor to inform or obtain the lessee's consent before charging. If the parties had intended such a restriction, it would have been stated expressly in the lease. In the absence of such a clause, the argument that the charge was irregular for want of consent fails.

p. 3
02

Priority of the registered lease over the later registered charge

Holding

The lease, registered first in time, took priority and the Bank is deemed to have had notice of it, but priority did not curtail the statutory power of sale

Reasoning

Applying sections 31 and 42 of the Registered Land Act (Cap 300), interests rank by order of registration and a later proprietor is deemed to have notice of earlier entries. The lease was registered in 2007, the charge in 2011. The purchaser would therefore buy subject to the lease encumbrance, but the Bank retained its right to sell on default.

p. 4
03

Effect of the lessee's first right of purchase on the chargee's power of sale

Holding

The statutory power of sale is modified: the Bank must first offer the property to the lessee on the terms of Clause 6 before auctioning it

Reasoning

Clause 6 gave the lessee a first right to purchase at a price assessed by three independent valuers, and barred the lessor from offering to any other person without first offering to the lessee. Since the Bank took with notice of the lease, its power of sale is exercised subject to that right; only if the lessee declines or fails to accept may the Bank sell by auction or to others.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • Under sections 31 and 42 of the Registered Land Act (Cap 300), interests appearing in the register have priority according to the order of presentation, and a later proprietor is deemed to have notice of earlier registered entries
  • Where a lease contains a right of first purchase, the chargee's statutory power of sale must be exercised so as to honour that right

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Bank, in disposing of the property in exercise of its statutory power of sale, to first offer the land parcel Eldoret Municipality/Block 12/131 to the applicant in the same terms as provided for in clause 6 of the lease
  2. 2.If the applicant does not exercise its right of purchase within the time stipulated in Clause 6 of the lease, the Bank be at liberty to offer the suit property for sale in the manner stipulated by law in exercise of its statutory power of sale
  3. 3.Each party to bear his/her own costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Registered Land Act (Cap 300) (now repealed)Section 31
  • Registered Land Act (Cap 300) (now repealed)Section 42
Jurisdiction invoked
Original jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court over land matters (suit transferred from Eldoret ELC)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Turbo Highway Eldoret Limited & another v Bank of Africa Kenya Limited; Kenol Kobil Ltd (Applicant) (Environment & Land Case 364 of 2015) [2017] KEELC 3868 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2017). Not stated in the excerpt (application dated 6 May 2016 in the suit commenced 12 August 2015). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2017/3868/eng@2017-03-07

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.