Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedPetition dated 8th May 2015 (Mombasa)· [2017] KEELC 3723 (KLR)

Said Sood Mohamed Said Shikely v National Land Commision [2017] KEELC 3723 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
24 January 2017
2,131 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~9 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court awarded vacant possession of Wakf land, but refused orders against occupiers who were never joined to the case.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
In an undefended constitutional petition filed on 8th May 2015 at the Environment and Land Court, Mombasa, the Petitioner, as trustee of the Shikely Family Wakf, sought declarations that the National Land Commission's acquisition, possession, failure to hand over vacant possession and subletting of Wakf property Mombasa/Block XVII/635 violated his rights under Articles 40, 32, 39, 44 and 47 of the Constitution and the African Charter, together with mandatory injunctions for vacant possession, rectification of the register, a permanent injunction and compensation. The Respondent did not file a defence, but the court, per A. Omollo J, determined the petition on its merits. The court noted from the Petitioner's own disclosures that third parties occupied portions of the property and held leases yet were not joined, and held that orders directly affecting them could not issue without an opportunity to be heard, applying the natural justice principle in Onyango Oloo and distinguishing the Seventh Day Adventist Church case. The claims of infringement of freedom of religion, residence and culture were held far-fetched for want of pleading. The Petition succeeded only insofar as it sought vacant possession, in terms of reliefs (a), (e), (h), (j) and (m). Rectification of the register was refused because the register already showed the Petitioner and co-trustees as owners, and compensation failed because the loss was not proved. The petition partially succeeded and, being undefended, no order on costs was made.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether a court may grant orders affecting third parties not joined to a petition

Holding

No; third parties in occupation whose interests would be adversely affected had to be joined before orders could be granted against them.

Reasoning

The Petitioner's own pleadings and affidavit disclosed that third parties occupied portions of the Wakf property and held leases. Orders compelling vacant possession would directly affect them. Relying on Onyango Oloo, the court held that conclusive resolution required those parties to be brought on board, limiting the relief that could be granted in their absence.

p. 4
02

Whether freedom of religion, residence and culture were infringed

Holding

No; the claims under Articles 32, 39 and 44 failed for want of pleading and proof.

Reasoning

The Petitioner did not plead that the suit premises was intended for worship or cultural activities, so the alleged infringement of religion, culture and belief was far-fetched. The Seventh Day Adventist Church case was distinguished on its facts. The court confined success to the entitlement to vacant possession under reliefs (a), (e), (h), (j) and (m).

p. 5
03

Whether rectification of the register and compensation should issue

Holding

Both refused; the register already showed the Petitioner as owner and the loss was unproved.

Reasoning

A white/green card obtained at the court's request confirmed the Petitioner and co-trustees as registered owners of the two parcels, making rectification unnecessary. The compensation claim failed because the nature of the loss was not proved. The petition therefore partially succeeded only on vacant possession and the permanent injunction.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • Reliefs that would directly affect absent third parties with known interests in land cannot be granted without joining them, per natural justice
  • An undefended petition must still be determined on its merits

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Declarations granted in terms of reliefs contained in paragraph 68 (a), (e), (h) of the petition
  2. 2.Order for vacant possession granted in terms of relief (j)
  3. 3.Permanent injunction granted in terms of relief (m)
Jurisdiction invoked
Original constitutional petition under Article 40, 32, 39, 44 and 47 of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Said Sood Mohamed Said Shikely v National Land Commision [2017] KEELC 3723 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2017). Petition dated 8th May 2015 (Mombasa). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2017/3723/eng@2017-01-24

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.