Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedNot stated in the judgment· [2017] KEELC 3603 (KLR)

Peterson Macharia Muthami v Hannah Nyambura Githenya [2017] KEELC 3603 (KLR)

High Court of Kenya
23 January 2017
1,732 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's High Court confirmed that Land Dispute Tribunals cannot decide who owns registered land, so their awards on title are void.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was an appeal against an award of the Kieni East Land Dispute Tribunal, adopted as a judgment of the court on 16th July 2008, in which the Tribunal had found Hanna Nyambura Githenya to be the legitimate owner of land parcel Gakawa/Kahurura Block IV/239 and recommended cancellation of the title held by the appellant, Peterson Macharia Muthami, and the opening of a land register in the respondent's favour. The appellant appealed on three grounds: that the Tribunal entertained a matter based on title to land, that it failed to consider his evidence, and that the award was bad in law. The respondent opposed the appeal, arguing that the claim was properly one of trespass, that both parties submitted to the court's jurisdiction, and that the appeal was time-barred because it should have been filed within 30 days of the award rather than the adoption of the award. The court framed two issues: competency of the appeal as to time, and the Tribunal's jurisdiction. On the first, relying on Chege Macharia v. Francis Kimani Kirimira and Benson Maina Thiongo, the court held that the right of appeal accrues after the judgment is read, not after the date of the award, and overruled the time-bar objection. On jurisdiction, the court found the dispute turned on ownership of registered land, which Section 3 of the Land Dispute Tribunals Act did not confer power on Tribunals to determine, adopting Joseph Malakwen Lelei. The Tribunal therefore acted without jurisdiction and its award was a nullity. The appeal was allowed as prayed, with no separate costs order recorded.

Key legal issues

#
01

Time bar of the appeal

Holding

The appeal was not incompetent for being filed out of time; the appeal period ran from the reading of the judgment adopting the award

Reasoning

Although Section 8(1) required appeals within 30 days of the Tribunal's decision, the court took judicial notice of the practice whereby parties were notified of their right of appeal after judgment was read and adopted. Following Chege Macharia v. Francis Kimani Kirimira, the right of appeal accrues after the judgment is read, not after the date of the award. The time-bar objection was overruled.

p. 4
02

Jurisdiction of the Land Dispute Tribunal over title to registered land

Holding

The Tribunal lacked jurisdiction because the dispute turned on ownership of registered land

Reasoning

The dispute before the Tribunal concerned ownership of the suit property, registered land, with the respondent claiming the right to eject the appellant as owner. Section 3 of the Land Dispute Tribunals Act confined Tribunals to boundary disputes, claims to occupy or work land, and trespass. Adopting Joseph Malakwen Lelei, the court held that determination of title to registered land falls outside that jurisdiction, rendering the Tribunal's award a nullity.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • Section 3 of the Land Dispute Tribunals Act (repealed) does not confer jurisdiction on Land Dispute Tribunals to determine title to or ownership of registered land
  • The right of appeal from a Tribunal award accrues after the judgment is read and adopted, not after the date of the award

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Overruling the objection that the appeal was filed out of time
  2. 2.Allowing the appeal as prayed

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Registered Land Act, Cap 300 Laws of Kenya (repealed)Section 159
  • Land Dispute Tribunals Act (repealed)Section 3
  • Land Disputes Tribunals ActSection 8(1)
  • Land Disputes Tribunals ActSections 7(1) and (2)
  • Land Disputes Tribunals ActSection 8(9)

Cases cited (3)

  • Joseph Malakwen Lelei & Another V. Rift Valley Land Dispute Appeals Committee & 2 others
    (2014) eKLR
  • Benson Maina Thiongo V. Joseph Waweru Mwangi
    (2006) eKLR
  • Chege Macharia v. Francis Kimani Kirimira
    (2015) eKLR
On appeal from
Land Dispute Appeals Tribunal (from Kieni East Land Dispute Tribunal award adopted by the magistrates' court)
Not stated
Jurisdiction invoked
Appeal under Section 8 of the Land Disputes Tribunals Act (repealed)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Peterson Macharia Muthami v Hannah Nyambura Githenya [2017] KEELC 3603 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2017). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2017/3603/eng@2017-01-23

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.