Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedELC No. 100 of 2007· [2017] KEELC 3402 (KLR)

Samvo Limited v Delta Haulage Services Limited & another [2017] KEELC 3402 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
15 March 2017
1,386 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling by the Environment and Land Court at Nairobi determined a Notice of Motion dated 22 June 2016 by the second defendant, Catham Properties Limited, seeking consolidation of ELC No. 100 of 2007 with Nairobi ELC No. 326 of 2012 and Nairobi ELC No. 615 of 2014, all concerning competing claims of ownership over property in Kilimani, Nairobi originally described as LR No. 2/75. Samvo Limited claimed the property as unsubdivided Nairobi/Block 17/338 under freehold; Catham Properties claimed it as Nairobi Block 17/556 and 17/557; Delta Haulage Services Limited claimed it as LR No. 2/694 and 2/695 and, in ELC 615 of 2014, sought eviction, a permanent injunction, Kshs. 58 million for malicious damage and damages for trespass. Delta Haulage opposed consolidation, arguing there were no common questions of law or fact and that the first two suits had already been consolidated by consent on 27 October 2014. The court held the only issue was whether ELC 615 of 2014 should join the consolidated suits. Applying the overriding objective in Section 1A of the Civil Procedure Act and the principles in Law Society of Kenya v Centre for Human Rights and Democracy, Harwood v Statesman Publishing and Stumberg v Potgieter, the court found a common central issue of rightful ownership, no undue advantage or injustice to any party, and allowed consolidation with costs in the cause.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the three suits over the same Kilimani property should be consolidated

Holding

Yes. All three suits centre on ownership of the same property, the only differences being the description of the parcels and the registration regime; consolidation saves judicial time and litigation costs and disadvantages no party.

Reasoning

The court noted that ELC 100 of 2007 and ELC 326 of 2012 were already consolidated by consent, so the only question was whether ELC 615 of 2014 should join them. All three parties claim ownership of LR No. 2/75, differing only on parcel description and whether the land is freehold or leasehold. The central common issue - rightful ownership - would determine consequential claims like damages. Citing the Supreme Court in Law Society of Kenya v Centre for Human Rights and Democracy, Harwood v Statesman Publishing, and Stumberg v Potgieter, the court found common questions of fact and law and no injustice to the respondents.

p. 3
02

Whether a second consolidation order could issue where two suits were already consolidated

Holding

The existing consent consolidation of ELC 100 of 2007 and ELC 326 of 2012 stood; the only live question was consolidation of ELC 615 of 2014 with those two suits.

Reasoning

Delta Haulage argued that a second consolidation order could not be granted since the two suits were already consolidated. The court accepted that the earlier consolidation by consent on 27 October 2014 existed and framed the sole issue as whether ELC No. 615 of 2014 should be consolidated with the other two cases.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Consolidation is appropriate where suits raise common questions of law or fact, and furthers the overriding objective of just, expeditious, proportionate and affordable resolution of disputes
  • Consolidation must not confer undue advantage on the party seeking it nor occasion disadvantage or injustice to the party opposing it

Court orders

#
  1. 1.ELC No. 615 of 2014 (referred to in the order as ELC No. 615 of 2015) is consolidated with ELC No. 100 of 2007 and ELC No. 326 of 2012
  2. 2.Costs shall be in the cause

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure ActSection 1A

Cases cited (3)

  • Law Society of Kenya v The Centre for Human Rights and Democracy & others
    Petition No. 14 of 2013
  • Harwood v Statesman Publishing Co. Ltd & others
    (1929) ALL ER 554
  • Stumberg & another v Potgietor
    (1970) EA 323
Jurisdiction invoked
Inherent discretion under the Civil Procedure Act, Section 1A (overriding objective)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Samvo Limited v Delta Haulage Services Limited & another [2017] KEELC 3402 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2017). ELC No. 100 of 2007. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2017/3402/eng@2017-03-15

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.