Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNot stated in the judgment· [2017] KEELC 3036 (KLR)

Francis Njoroge Kiguongo v Francis Njoroge Kiguongo [2017] KEELC 3036 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
9 March 2017
3,941 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~16 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court refused to add the National Land Commission to a land dispute, ruling it is only a witness since it merely holds land records.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This Ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Nairobi (B M Eboso J) determined the Defendant's Notice of Motion dated 31st March 2015 seeking leave to enjoin the National Land Commission as a 2nd Defendant in a suit brought by the Plaintiff, Francis Njoroge Kiguongo, seeking ejection of the Defendant from Nairobi Block 129/509. The Defendant contended that the Plaintiff's title was fraudulently and irregularly issued by the Commissioner of Lands, the Commission's predecessor, and that the Commission held vital information relating to the suit property. The Plaintiff opposed, arguing that an identical application to enjoin the Commissioner of Lands had been dismissed by the Deputy Registrar on 26th October 2012; that the application was belated and statute-barred; and that the Commission was merely a custodian of records, hence a witness rather than a litigant. The court framed two questions: whether the Commission was a necessary party for the effectual adjudication of the suit, and whether the application was res judicata. Applying Order 1 Rule 10(2) and the principles in Civicon v Kivuwatt, Central Kenya Ltd v Trust Bank and Meme v Republic, the court held that the Commission was not a necessary party since the substantive question was trespass, and the Commission's officers could be summoned to produce records as witnesses. The court further held that, the defendant having failed to appeal or seek review of the Deputy Registrar's dismissal of the earlier joinder application, the present application was barred by res judicata under Section 7 of the Civil Procedure Act and constituted an abuse of process. The application was dismissed with costs to the Plaintiff, and directions were given for the parties to take a hearing date promptly.

Key legal issues

#
01

Joinder of the National Land Commission as a necessary party under Order 1 Rule 10(2)

Holding

The Commission is not a necessary party because the question in the main suit is whether the defendant is a trespasser, and the Commission's records can be produced through its officers summoned as witnesses

Reasoning

The court examined the pleadings to identify the substantive question, which was whether the defendant was a trespasser. The only ground for joinder was that the Commission holds records relating to the suit property. Holding records as a constitutional body performing public functions does not make it a necessary party to litigation over what the parties consider private land; summoning its officers to produce records suffices.

p. 6
02

Res judicata arising from the earlier dismissal of the application to enjoin the Commissioner of Lands

Holding

The application is barred by res judicata because the Deputy Registrar dismissed a prior application to enjoin the Commissioner of Lands, the statutory predecessor of the Commission, and the defendant did not appeal or seek review

Reasoning

The Deputy Registrar had determined a prior application under Order 49 Rule 7(1)(b) dismissing the joinder of the Commissioner of Lands. The defendant elected not to appeal under Order 49 Rule 7(2) and (3) nor to seek review under Section 12 of the Environment and Land Court Act. Renewing the application against the Commission, the acknowledged successor, was res judicata and an abuse of process.

p. 7

Legal principles established

#
  • The paramount consideration for joinder is whether the party concerned is necessary for the effectual and complete adjudication of all the questions involved in the suit
  • A body that merely holds records relevant to a suit is a witness, not a necessary litigant
  • Res judicata applies to interlocutory applications brought within suits
  • Renewing via a successor body an application to enjoin a party previously refused is an abuse of process

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Defendant's Notice of Motion Application dated 31st March 2015 seeking leave to enjoin the National Land Commission as a Defendant in the suit is dismissed with costs to the Plaintiff
  2. 2.Parties to take a convenient hearing date as soon as the Ruling is delivered

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya 2010Article 159(2)
  • Constitution of Kenya 2010Article 67
  • National Land Commission ActSections 30 and 32
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 1 Rule 10(2) and (4)
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 8 Rule 3
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 49 Rule 7(1)(b), (2) and (3)
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 7
  • Environment & Land Court ActSection 12
  • Public Authorities Act (Cap 39)Section 3(2)
  • Government Proceedings Act (Cap 4)Section 13A

Cases cited (12)

  • Mbeere Elders Advisory Welfare Group & 4 Others –Vs- Attorney General & 5 others
    (2015) eKLR
  • Republic Vs National Land Commission & Another; Ex parte Muktar Saman Olow
    (2015) eKLR
  • Eastern Bakery Vs Castelino
    (1958) EA 461 (CA)
  • Bayusuf Brothers Ltd Vs Kyalo
    (1981) KR 407
  • Shah Vs Aperit Investments SA & Ano.
    (2003) 1 KLR 120
  • Atieno Vs Omoro
    (1985) KLR 677
  • Kivuva Vs Res Motors & 2 others
    (1987) KLR 670
  • Civicon Limited Vs Kivuwatt Limited & 2 Others
    [2015] eKLR
  • Meme Vs Republic
    (2004) KLR 637
  • Central Kenya Ltd Vs Trust Bank Ltd & Others
    CA No. 222 of 1998
  • John Florence Maritime Services Limited & Ano. Vs Cabinet Secretary for Transport and Infrastructure & 3 Others
    (2015) eKLR
  • Henderson Vs Henderson
    (1843) 67 ER 313
Jurisdiction invoked
Environment and Land Court Act; Civil Procedure Rules Order 1 Rule 10

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Francis Njoroge Kiguongo v Francis Njoroge Kiguongo [2017] KEELC 3036 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2017). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2017/3036/eng@2017-03-09

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.