Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNot stated in judgment· [2017] KEELC 2867 (KLR)

Joseph Masinde Busuru v Playton Leonard Wekesa & another [2017] KEELC 2867 (KLR)

High Court of Kenya
11 May 2017
482 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~2 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The High Court refused to undo a judgment won in the defendant's absence because neither he nor his lawyer could credibly explain missing the hearing.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was an application under Order 10 Rule 11 and Sections 3 and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act to set aside a judgment entered against the applicant after a hearing at which neither he nor his counsel appeared. The applicant asserted that he was in court the whole morning and up to 4 p.m. on 23/9/2015 but did not see his file called or the plaintiff testify. The respondent, through a replying affidavit, showed that the defendants and their counsel were invited to fix a hearing date but did not attend; a hearing notice dated 16/5/2015 was served on the defendants' advocates on 18/5/2015; and that on the hearing date of 23/9/2015 the defendants and their counsel came to court but left before the case was heard. The respondent also annexed the plaint in PM CC No. 27/2010, filed by the applicant on 9/2/2010 against Lawrence Simiyu Nandasaba, Judith Wafula Simiyu and Meshack Nandasaba, claiming a refund of the purchase price of one acre out of Ndivisi/Ndivisi/1725, and argued there was no privity of contract between him and the applicant. Mukunya J reviewed the coram, which showed the case began at 3.30 p.m. and three witnesses testified, disbelieved the applicant's account, and found no explanation for counsel's absence. Observing that the earlier Webuye suit for a refund of the purchase price remained pending and unchallenged, the court dismissed the application with costs to the respondent.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the judgment should be set aside under Order 10 Rule 11

Holding

The application lacked merit; the applicant and his counsel were served with a hearing notice but did not attend the hearing, and no credible explanation for absence was offered.

Reasoning

The coram showed the case began at 3.30 p.m. on 23/9/2015 and three witnesses gave evidence. The applicant alleged he waited in court until 4 p.m., which the court found impossible to believe. His counsel's absence was likewise unexplained. Service of the hearing notice dated 16/5/2015 on the defendants' advocates on 18/5/2015 was established, satisfying the requirements for proceeding ex parte.

p. 1
02

Whether a parallel suit (PM CC No. 27/2010) affects the applicant's position

Holding

The applicant had earlier filed a pending claim at the Webuye Magistrates' Court for a refund of the purchase price, and that is the proper forum for him to pursue his claim.

Reasoning

The respondent demonstrated, by annexing the plaint, that the applicant had filed a suit on 9/2/2010 against Lawrence Simiyu Nandasaba, Judith Wafula Simiyu and Meshack Nandasaba claiming a refund of the purchase price of one acre out of Ndivisi/Ndivisi/1725. That suit was pending when this case was heard, predating the present suit, and no denial of its existence was made.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A party seeking to set aside a judgment taken in default must give a credible explanation for non-attendance, and a hearing notice duly served on the party's advocates suffices.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application for setting aside the judgment is dismissed
  2. 2.Costs of the application awarded to the respondent
Jurisdiction invoked
Order 10 Rule 11 and Sections 3 and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Joseph Masinde Busuru v Playton Leonard Wekesa & another [2017] KEELC 2867 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2017). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2017/2867/eng@2017-05-11

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.